ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021
Gender Differences in the Medical Treatment of Peripheral Artery Disease.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- New insights on the cardiovascular effects of IGF-1.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Pooled it
- Female patients at increased risk for adverse outcomes after acute limb ischemia.Journal of vascular surgery · 2026Article
- Clinician underprescription of and patient nonadherence to clinical practice guideline-recommended medications for peripheral artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Prediction of Major Adverse Limb Events in Females with Peripheral Artery Disease using Blood-Based Biomarkers and Clinical Features.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2025Article
- Vascular Diseases in Women: Do Women Suffer from Them Differently?Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- The Pink Tax: Sex and Gender Disparities in Peripheral Artery Disease.US cardiology · 2024Review
- Sex differences in outcomes of exercise therapy for patients with intermittent claudication: A scoping review.Seminars in vascular surgery · 2023Article
- A hidden problem: peripheral artery disease in women.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2023Review
- Update on Management of Cardiovascular Diseases in Women.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesPeripheral arterial disease is a frequent and severe disease with high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. However, female patients appear to be undertreated.
objectivesThe primary goal was to compare the prescription of optimal medical treatment (OMT) of peripheral arterial disease between women and men in primary health care. MATERIAL AND
methodsAn observational retrospective study was based on the data collected from general practitioners (GP) office in Brittany.
resultsThe study included 100 patients, aged 71 ± 10 years old, with 24% of women. Compared to men, women received the OMT less frequently (29.2% vs. 53.9%,
conclusionOptimal medical treatment of peripheral artery disease is insufficiently prescribed, especially in women in this region of France.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.