Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34203122›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Assessing the Functional Status of Patients with Chronic Pain-Cross Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Serbian Version of the Pain Disability Questionnaire.

Aleksandar Knežević, Petar Čolović, Milica Jeremić-Knežević, Čila Demeši-Drljan, Dušica Simić-Panić, Randy Neblett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aleksandar KneževićFaculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia.
Petar ČolovićDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia.
Milica Jeremić-KneževićFaculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia.
Čila Demeši-DrljanFaculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia.
Dušica Simić-PanićFaculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia.
Randy NeblettPRIDE Research Foundation, Dallas, TX 75235, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Pain Disability Questionnaire (PDQ) has established itself as a leading patient-reported outcome measure for assessing both mental and physical components of pain-related disability. The current study aimed to translate the PDQ into Serbian and validate its psychometric properties. Following a standard translation process, a total of 554 chronic pain patients (average age 55.37 ± 12.72 years; 375 (67.5%) females) completed the PDQ-Serb, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short Form-36 (SF-36), pain intensity rating and a six-minute walk test (6MWT). Responsiveness was examined in a subsample of 141 patients who completed an inpatient rehabilitation program. The internal consistency of the PDQ-Serb was excellent (Cronbach α = 0.92) and test-retest reliability was favorable (ICC = 0.87). Factor analyses found a bifactor model to be the best fit (CFI = 0.97: TLI = 0.96: RMSEA = 0.05; SRMR = 0.03). Statistically significant Pearson's coefficient correlations (

Indexed as

Chronic PainLow Back PainAdultAgedCross-Cultural ComparisonDisability EvaluationFemaleFunctional StatusHumansMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaireschronic paindisabilitydisability evaluationfunctionPain Disability Questionnairephysical functional performancepsychosocial distressquality of life

Identifiers

PMID34203122
PMCPMC8297208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.