Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34203089›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Revisiting Non-Thermal Food Processing and Preservation Methods-Action Mechanisms, Pros and Cons: A Technological Update (2016-2021).

James S Chacha, Liyan Zhang, Chigozie E Ofoedu, Rashid A Suleiman, Joachim M Dotto, Ume Roobab, Adedoyin O Agunbiade, Haile Tesfaye Duguma, Beatha T Mkojera, Sayed Mahdi Hossaini and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
12.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 146 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Emerging Nonthermal Technologies for the Production of Postbiotics.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Methods of Controlling Microbial Contamination of Food.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  13. Overcoming Dormancy of Black Locust (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Effectiveness of gaseous ozone onOpen veterinary journal · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 8 countries.

James S ChachaDepartment of Food Technology, Nutrition, and Consumer Sciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, P.O. Box 3006 Chuo Kikuu, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0002-6147-0458
Liyan ZhangSchool of Food Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7757-0277
Chigozie E OfoeduSchool of Food Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0835-5872
Rashid A SuleimanDepartment of Food Technology, Nutrition, and Consumer Sciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, P.O. Box 3006 Chuo Kikuu, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0001-8479-3826
Joachim M DottoSchool of Life Sciences and Bioengineering, Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 447 Arusha, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0002-3982-4600
Ume RoobabSchool of Food Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6075-6737
Adedoyin O AgunbiadeSchool of Food Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3752-3417
Haile Tesfaye DugumaSchool of Food Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0988-8283
Beatha T MkojeraDepartment of Food Technology, Nutrition, and Consumer Sciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, P.O. Box 3006 Chuo Kikuu, Tanzania.
Sayed Mahdi HossainiDIL German Institute of Food Technologies, Prof.-von-Klitzing-Str. 7, D-49610 Quakenbrück, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7733-6042
Waheed A RasaqDepartment of Applied Bioeconomy, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 51-630 Wrocław, Poland.
Ivan ShorstkiiDepartment of Technological Equipment and Life-Support Systems, Kuban State Technological University, 350072 Krasnodar, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-5804-7950
Charles Odilichukwu R OkpalaFaculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 51-630 Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4475-8887
Malgorzata KorzeniowskaFaculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 51-630 Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0300-0407
Raquel P F GuinéCERNAS Research Centre, Polytechnic Institute of Viseu, 3504-510 Viseu, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0595-6805
Sokoine University of Agriculture · TZWrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences · PLSouth China University of Technology · CNFederal University of Technology Owerri · NGGerman Institute of Food Technologies · DEJimma University · ETKuban State Technological University · RUNelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology · TZResearch Center for Natural Resources, Environment and Society · PTUniversity of Ibadan · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The push for non-thermal food processing methods has emerged due to the challenges associated with thermal food processing methods, for instance, high operational costs and alteration of food nutrient components. Non-thermal food processing involves methods where the food materials receive microbiological inactivation without or with little direct application of heat. Besides being well established in scientific literature, research into non-thermal food processing technologies are constantly on the rise as applied to a wide range of food products. Due to such remarkable progress by scientists and researchers, there is need for continuous synthesis of relevant scientific literature for the benefit of all actors in the agro-food value chain, most importantly the food processors, and to supplement existing information. This review, therefore, aimed to provide a technological update on some selected non-thermal food processing methods specifically focused on their operational mechanisms, their effectiveness in preserving various kinds of foods, as revealed by their pros (merits) and cons (demerits). Specifically, pulsed electric field, pulsed light, ultraviolet radiation, high-pressure processing, non-thermal (cold) plasma, ozone treatment, ionizing radiation, and ultrasound were considered. What defines these techniques, their ability to exhibit limited changes in the sensory attributes of food, retain the food nutrient contents, ensure food safety, extend shelf-life, and being eco-friendly were highlighted. Rationalizing the process mechanisms about these specific non-thermal technologies alongside consumer education can help raise awareness prior to any design considerations, improvement of cost-effectiveness, and scaling-up their capacity for industrial-level applications.

Indexed as

agro-food industryfood preservationfood processorsnon-thermal food processingproduct development

Identifiers

PMID34203089
PMCPMC8234293
OpenAlexW3176365770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.