ArticleMicromachines2021
Microrheometer for Biofluidic Analysis: Electronic Detection of the Fluid-Front Advancement.
Article in Micromachines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Micro Blood Flow-Resolved Rheometry.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Rheological analysis in food processing: factors, applications, and future outlooks with machine learning integration.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Enhanced Imbibition in Liquid-Infused Coated Microchannels.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2024Article
- Microfluidic techniques for mechanical measurements of biological samples.Biophysics reviews · 2023Review
- Biosensing of Haemorheological Properties Using Microblood Flow Manipulation and Quantification.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Analysis of Polarization Images in the Microphysical Blood Parameters Research for the Hematocrit Diagnostics.Micromachines · 2022Article
- Editorial for the Special Issue on Nanostructured Surfaces and Devices for Biomedical Applications.Micromachines · 2022Article
- Microfluidics Approach to the Mechanical Properties of Red Blood Cell Membrane and Their Effect on Blood Rheology.Membranes · 2022Article
- A Review of Microfluidic Devices for Rheological Characterisation.Micromachines · 2022Review
- Blood Rheological Characterization of β-Thalassemia Trait and Iron Deficiency Anemia Using Front Microrheometry.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The motivation for this study was to develop a microdevice for the precise rheological characterization of biofluids, especially blood. The method presented was based on the principles of rheometry and fluid mechanics at the microscale. Traditional rheometers require a considerable amount of space, are expensive, and require a large volume of sample. A mathematical model was developed that, combined with a proper experimental model, allowed us to characterize the viscosity of Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids at different shear rates. The technology presented here is the basis of a point-of-care device capable of describing the nonlinear rheology of biofluids by the fluid/air interface front velocity characterization through a microchannel. The proposed microrheometer uses a small amount of sample to deliver fast and accurate results, without needing a large laboratory space. Blood samples from healthy donors at distinct hematocrit percentages were the non-Newtonian fluid selected for the study. Water and plasma were employed as testing Newtonian fluids for validation of the system. The viscosity results obtained for the Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids were consistent with pertinent studies cited in this paper. In addition, the results achieved using the proposed method allowed distinguishing between blood samples with different characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.