Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34202994›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

International HIV Dementia Scale for HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Elena Cecilia Rosca, Philippe Tadger, Amalia Cornea, Raluca Tudor, Cristian Oancea, Mihaela Simu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Neurocognitive improvement in HIV-positive patients treated with dolutegravir-based regimens.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elena Cecilia RoscaDepartment of Neurology, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-2412-1942
Philippe TadgerIndependent Researcher, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1453-4105
Amalia CorneaDepartment of Neurology, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-7293-3414
Raluca TudorDepartment of Neurology, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-1971-6901
Cristian OanceaCenter for Research and Innovation in Precision Medicine of Respiratory Diseases, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Victor Babes" Timisoara, 300173 Timisoara, Romania.
Mihaela SimuDepartment of Neurology, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-9676-1282
Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study aims to systematically review the evidence on the accuracy of the International HIV Dementia Scale (IHDS) test for diagnosing human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) and outline the quality and quantity of research evidence available on the accuracy of IHDS in people living with HIV. We conducted a systematic literature review, searching five databases from inception until July 2020. We extracted dichotomized positive and negative test results at various thresholds and calculated the sensitivity and specificity of IHDS. Quality assessment was performed according to the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) criteria. Fifteen cross-sectional studies, published between 2011 and 2018, met the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. Overall, 3760 patients were included, but most studies recruited small samples. We assessed most studies as being applicable to the review question, though we had concerns about the selection of participants in three studies. The accuracy of IHDS was investigated at thirteen cut-off points (scores 6-12). The threshold of 10 is the most useful for optimal HAND screening (including asymptomatic neurocognitive disorder, symptomatic HAND, and HIV-associated dementia) with fair diagnostic accuracy.

Indexed as

HIV-associated neurocognitive disorderInternational HIV Dementia Scalemeta-analysissystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34202994
PMCPMC8235728
OpenAlexW3175685856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.