Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34202993›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2021

Sitafloxacin for Third-Line

Toshihiro Nishizawa, Munkhbayar Munkjargal, Hirotoshi Ebinuma, Osamu Toyoshima, Hidekazu Suzuki

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Third-line and rescue therapy for refractoryWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Some Newer Antibiotics Active AgainstAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Advances in the Management of RefractoryGastro hep advances · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Antibacterial Mechanisms and Clinical Impact of Sitafloxacin.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Single-Arm, Prospective, Interventional Study ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Article
  13. Emergence ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  14. Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  15. Newer, Older, and Alternative Agents for the Eradication ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  16. Treatment ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Current guidelines forWorld journal of clinical cases · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Toshihiro NishizawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, International University of Health and Welfare, Narita Hospital, Narita 286-8520, Japan.
Munkhbayar MunkjargalDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, International University of Health and Welfare, Narita Hospital, Narita 286-8520, Japan.
Hirotoshi EbinumaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, International University of Health and Welfare, Narita Hospital, Narita 286-8520, Japan.
Osamu ToyoshimaGastroenterology, Toyoshima Endoscopy Clinic, Tokyo 157-0066, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6953-6079
Hidekazu SuzukiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara 259-1193, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8994-6163
International University of Health and Welfare · JPTokai University · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 20H036672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimSitafloxacin-based therapy is a potent candidate for third-line

methodsClinical studies were systematically searched using PubMed, Cochrane library, Web of Science, and the Igaku-Chuo-Zasshi database. We combined data from clinical studies using a random-effects model and calculated pooled event rates, 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and the pooled odds ratio (OR).

resultsWe included twelve clinical studies in the present systematic review. The mean eradication rate for 7-day regimens of either PPI (proton pump inhibitor) or vonoprazan-sitafloxacin-amoxicillin was 80.6% (95% CI, 75.2-85.0). The vonoprazan-sitafloxacin-amoxicillin regimen was significantly superior to the PPI-sitafloxacin-amoxicillin regimen (pooled OR of successful eradication: 6.00; 95% CI: 2.25-15.98,

conclusionsAlthough the 7-day regimen composed of vonoprazan, sitafloxacin, and amoxicillin is a good option as the third-line

Indexed as

H. pylorisitafloxacinvonoprazan

Identifiers

PMID34202993
PMCPMC8234224
OpenAlexW3175919001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.