Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34202946›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2021

The Paternal Brain in Action: A Review of Human Fathers' fMRI Brain Responses to Child-Related Stimuli.

Livio Provenzi, Johanna Lindstedt, Kris De Coen, Linda Gasparini, Denis Peruzzo, Serena Grumi, Filippo Arrigoni, Sari Ahlqvist-Björkroth

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Livio ProvenziChild Psychiatry and Neurology Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7424-8744
Johanna LindstedtDepartment of Psychology and Speech-Language Pathology, University of Turku, 20500 Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-8771-7797
Kris De CoenNeonatal Intensive Care Department, University Hospital of Ghent, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2487-0476
Linda GaspariniDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, Università di Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Denis PeruzzoNeuroimaging Lab, Scientific Institute IRCCS E. Medea, 23842 Bosisio Parini, Italy.
Serena GrumiChild Psychiatry and Neurology Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4353-3803
Filippo ArrigoniNeuroimaging Lab, Scientific Institute IRCCS E. Medea, 23842 Bosisio Parini, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5508-1149
Sari Ahlqvist-BjörkrothDepartment of Psychology and Speech-Language Pathology, University of Turku, 20500 Turku, Finland.
IRCCS Eugenio Medea · ITUniversity of Turku · FIGhent University Hospital · BEUniversity of Pavia · IT

Funding

Ministero della Salute Cinque per Mille 2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As fathers are increasingly involved in childcare, understanding the neurological underpinnings of fathering has become a key research issue in developmental psychobiology research. This systematic review specifically focused on (1) highlighting methodological issues of paternal brain research using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and (2) summarizing findings related to paternal brain responses to auditory and visual infant stimuli. Sixteen papers were included from 157 retrieved records. Sample characteristics (e.g., fathers' and infant's age, number of kids, and time spent caregiving), neuroimaging information (e.g., technique, task, stimuli, and processing), and main findings were synthesized by two independent authors. Most of the reviewed works used different stimuli and tasks to test fathers' responses to child visual and/or auditory stimuli. Pre-processing and first-level analyses were performed with standard pipelines. Greater heterogeneity emerged in second-level analyses. Three main cortical networks (mentalization, embodied simulation, and emotion regulation) and a subcortical network emerged linked with fathers' responses to infants' stimuli, but additional areas (e.g., frontal gyrus, posterior cingulate cortex) were also responsive to infants' visual or auditory stimuli. This review suggests that a distributed and complex brain network may be involved in facilitating fathers' sensitivity and responses to infant-related stimuli. Nonetheless, specific methodological caveats, the exploratory nature of large parts of the literature to date, and the presence of heterogeneous tasks and measures also demonstrate that systematic improvements in study designs are needed to further advance the field.

Indexed as

brainfatherfMRIneuroimagingparenting

Identifiers

PMID34202946
PMCPMC8233834
OpenAlexW3173498653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.