Trial reportGenes2021
Framing Effects on Decision-Making for Diagnostic Genetic Testing: Results from a Randomized Trial.
Trial report in Genes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04372888 (Examining Choice Architecture for Genetic Testing Decisions), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Examining Choice Architecture for Genetic Testing Decisions
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Online education for rare genetic diseases: a systematic review.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Exploring the Emotional Effects of Reproductive Decision-Making in Women With a BRCA Pathogenic Variant.Oncology nursing forum · 2025Article
- Article
- Patient decisions regarding cancer gene panel testing: An exploratory study.Journal of genetic counseling · 2024Article
- Family communication of cancer genetic test results in an ethnically diverse population: a qualitative exploration of more than 200 patients.Journal of community genetics · 2024Article
- Understanding cancer genetic risk assessment motivations in a remote tailored risk communication and navigation intervention randomized controlled trial.Health psychology and behavioral medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic testing is increasingly part of routine clinical care. However, testing decisions may be characterized by regret as findings also implicate blood relatives. It is not known if genetic testing decisions are affected by the way information is presented (i.e., framing effects). We employed a randomized factorial design to examine framing effects on hypothetical genetic testing scenarios (common, life-threatening disease and rare, life-altering disease). Participants (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.