Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34202898›Full record

ArticleNutrients2021

Diagnostic Performance and Accuracy of the MNA-SF against GLIM Criteria in Community-Dwelling Older Adults from Poland.

Aleksandra Kaluźniak-Szymanowska, Roma Krzymińska-Siemaszko, Marta Lewandowicz, Ewa Deskur-Śmielecka, Katarzyna Stachnik, Katarzyna Wieczorowska-Tobis

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aleksandra Kaluźniak-SzymanowskaDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-245 Poznan, Poland.
Roma Krzymińska-SiemaszkoDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-245 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6770-7321
Marta LewandowiczDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-245 Poznan, Poland.
Ewa Deskur-ŚmieleckaDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-245 Poznan, Poland.
Katarzyna StachnikDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-245 Poznan, Poland.
Katarzyna Wieczorowska-TobisDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-245 Poznan, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Up to 28% of elderly residents in Europe are at risk of malnutrition. As uniform diagnostic criteria for malnutrition have not been formulated, in autumn 2018, the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) presented a consensus on its diagnosis. According to the consensus, the diagnosis of malnutrition requires a positive screening test result for the risk of malnutrition, and the presence of at least one etiologic and one phenotypic criterion. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance and accuracy of the Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF) against GLIM criteria. The analysis involved 273 community-dwelling volunteers aged ≥ 60 years. All participants were screened for malnutrition with the MNA-SF questionnaire. Next, the GLIM phenotypic and etiologic criteria were assessed in all subjects. Based on the presence of at least one phenotypic and one etiologic criterion, malnutrition was diagnosed in more than one-third of participants (

Indexed as

Geriatric AssessmentNutrition AssessmentAgedArea Under CurveConsensusCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIndependent LivingMaleMalnutritionMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPolandPrevalenceReproducibility of Resultsdiagnosismalnutritionolder adults

Identifiers

PMID34202898
PMCPMC8308417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.