Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34202820›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Event-Centered Data Segmentation in Accelerometer-Based Fall Detection Algorithms.

Goran Šeketa, Lovro Pavlaković, Dominik Džaja, Igor Lacković, Ratko Magjarević

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Intelligent Biosignal Analysis Methods.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Goran ŠeketaFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-4212-1161
Lovro PavlakovićFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Dominik DžajaFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Igor LackovićFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-4504-1901
Ratko MagjarevićFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
University of Zagreb · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automatic fall detection systems ensure that elderly people get prompt assistance after experiencing a fall. Fall detection systems based on accelerometer measurements are widely used because of their portability and low cost. However, the ability of these systems to differentiate falls from Activities of Daily Living (ADL) is still not acceptable for everyday usage at a large scale. More work is still needed to raise the performance of these systems. In our research, we explored an essential but often neglected part of accelerometer-based fall detection systems-data segmentation. The aim of our work was to explore how different configurations of windows for data segmentation affect detection accuracy of a fall detection system and to find the best-performing configuration. For this purpose, we designed a testing environment for fall detection based on a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier and evaluated the influence of the number and duration of segmentation windows on the overall detection accuracy. Thereby, an event-centered approach for data segmentation was used, where windows are set relative to a potential fall event detected in the input data. Fall and ADL data records from three publicly available datasets were utilized for the test. We found that a configuration of three sequential windows (pre-impact, impact, and post-impact) provided the highest detection accuracy on all three datasets. The best results were obtained when either a 0.5 s or a 1 s long impact window was used, combined with pre- and post-impact windows of 3.5 s or 3.75 s.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsActivities of Daily LivingAccelerometryAgedAlgorithmsHumansMonitoring, Ambulatoryaccelerometerevent-centered data segmentationfall detectionwearable sensorswindow duration

Identifiers

PMID34202820
PMCPMC8272179
OpenAlexW3174573387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.