Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34202679›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Uniaxial Compression Mechanical Properties of Foam Nickel/Iron-Epoxy Interpenetrating Phase Composites.

Xiaoxing Wang, Yu Zhou, Jingli Li, Huijian Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiaoxing WangSchool of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China.
Yu ZhouSchool of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China.
Jingli LiSchool of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China.
Huijian LiSchool of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province A2017203272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The damage process and failure mechanisms were analyzed by a series of quasi-static compressive experiments of seven materials including pure epoxy (EP), three different PPI (pores per linear inch) foam nickel-iron, and three different PPI foam nickel/iron-epoxy interpenetrating phase composites (IPC). Plotting the stress-strain curves of different materials, their change rules are discussed, then the effective elastic modulus and yield limit of the materials are provided, and the energy absorption properties of different materials are analyzed by the stress-strain curves. It was found that the effective elastic modulus and specific stiffness of the three IPC materials were higher than pure foam nickel-iron. The brittleness of epoxy can be obviously changed by selecting a suitable PPI foam nickel-iron composited with it. The unit volume energy absorption rate of foam nickel/iron-epoxy was significantly higher than pure epoxy and pure foam nickel-iron. It was also found that the energy absorption rate decreased with the increase in PPI. The stress relaxation rate decreased first and then increased with the increase in PPI. The creep behavior of the three composites was obvious in the creep elastic stage, and the creep rate increased with the increase in PPI. The creep rate decreased with the increase in PPI in the creep transition stage.

Indexed as

creep deformationenergy absorbinginterpenetrating phase compositesmechanical propertiesstress relaxationuniaxial compression experiments

Identifiers

PMID34202679
PMCPMC8269595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.