ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Uniaxial Compression Mechanical Properties of Foam Nickel/Iron-Epoxy Interpenetrating Phase Composites.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- On quantifying dynamic behavior of architected metal/polymer TPMS/lattices-based interpenetrating phase composites.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Steel Ball Impact on SiC/AlSi12 Interpenetrated Composite by Peridynamics.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Analysis of Advanced Pore Morphology (APM) Foam Elements Using Compressive Testing and Time-Lapse Computed Microtomography.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The damage process and failure mechanisms were analyzed by a series of quasi-static compressive experiments of seven materials including pure epoxy (EP), three different PPI (pores per linear inch) foam nickel-iron, and three different PPI foam nickel/iron-epoxy interpenetrating phase composites (IPC). Plotting the stress-strain curves of different materials, their change rules are discussed, then the effective elastic modulus and yield limit of the materials are provided, and the energy absorption properties of different materials are analyzed by the stress-strain curves. It was found that the effective elastic modulus and specific stiffness of the three IPC materials were higher than pure foam nickel-iron. The brittleness of epoxy can be obviously changed by selecting a suitable PPI foam nickel-iron composited with it. The unit volume energy absorption rate of foam nickel/iron-epoxy was significantly higher than pure epoxy and pure foam nickel-iron. It was also found that the energy absorption rate decreased with the increase in PPI. The stress relaxation rate decreased first and then increased with the increase in PPI. The creep behavior of the three composites was obvious in the creep elastic stage, and the creep rate increased with the increase in PPI. The creep rate decreased with the increase in PPI in the creep transition stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.