Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34202678›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Post-Mortem Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Long-Buried Lung Samples.

Nicolò Musso, Luca Falzone, Stefano Stracquadanio, Dafne Bongiorno, Monica Salerno, Massimiliano Esposito, Francesco Sessa, Massimo Libra, Stefania Stefani, Cristoforo Pomara

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. SARS-CoV-2's high rate of genetic mutation under immune selective pressure: from oropharyngeal B.1.1.7 to intrapulmonary B.1.533 in a vaccinated patient.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicolò MussoLaboratory of Molecular and Resistant Antibiotic Medical Microbiology (MMAR), Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIOMETEC), University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2451-1158
Luca FalzoneLaboratory of Experimental Oncology, Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIOMETEC), University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7349-6826
Stefano StracquadanioLaboratory of Molecular and Resistant Antibiotic Medical Microbiology (MMAR), Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIOMETEC), University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0653-9560
Dafne BongiornoLaboratory of Molecular and Resistant Antibiotic Medical Microbiology (MMAR), Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIOMETEC), University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8672-0484
Monica SalernoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia", Institute of Legal Medicine, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.
Massimiliano EspositoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia", Institute of Legal Medicine, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7880-3450
Francesco SessaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0357-8791
Massimo LibraLaboratory of Experimental Oncology, Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIOMETEC), University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7232-7737
Stefania StefaniLaboratory of Molecular and Resistant Antibiotic Medical Microbiology (MMAR), Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIOMETEC), University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1594-7427
Cristoforo PomaraDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia", Institute of Legal Medicine, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9895-3402
University of Catania · ITUniversity of Foggia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused an unexpected death toll worldwide. Even though several guidelines for the management of infectious corpses have been proposed, the limited number of post-mortem analyses during the pandemic has led to inaccuracies in the counting of COVID-19 deaths and contributed to a lack of important information about the pathophysiology of the SARS-CoV-2 infection. Due to the impossibility of carrying out autopsies on all corpses, the scientific community has raised the question of whether confirmatory analyses could be performed on exhumed bodies after a long period of burial to assess the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Post-mortem lung samples were collected from 16 patients who died from COVID-19 infection and were buried for a long period of time. A custom RNA extraction protocol was developed to enhance extraction of viral RNA from degraded samples and highly sensitive molecular methods, including RT-qPCR and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), were used to detect the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. The custom extraction protocol developed allowed us to extract total RNA effectively from all lung samples collected. SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA was effectively detected in all samples by both RT-qPCR and ddPCR, regardless of the length of burial. ddPCR results confirmed the persistence of the virus in this anatomical niche and revealed high viral loads in some lung samples, suggesting active infection at the time of death. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA in the lung even after a long post-mortem interval (up to 78 days). The extraction protocol herein described, and the highly sensitive molecular analyses performed, could represent the standard procedures for SARS-CoV-2 detection in degraded lung specimens. Finally, the innovative results obtained encourage post-mortem confirmatory analyses even after a long post-mortem interval.

Indexed as

autopsyCOVID-19post-mortem swabSARS-CoV-2viral RNA

Identifiers

PMID34202678
PMCPMC8304625
OpenAlexW3173382410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.