Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34202634›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Human Neuronal Cell Lines as An In Vitro Toxicological Tool for the Evaluation of Novel Psychoactive Substances.

Valeria Sogos, Paola Caria, Clara Porcedda, Rafaela Mostallino, Franca Piras, Cristina Miliano, Maria Antonietta De Luca, M Paola Castelli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Synthetic Cathinones and Neurotoxicity Risks: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Protective Effect of Arzanol against HInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. 2-Phenethylamines in Medicinal Chemistry: A Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Molecular Insights on New Psychoactive Substances (NPSs).International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Valeria SogosDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, 09042 Monserrato, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4021-1043
Paola CariaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, 09042 Monserrato, Italy.
Clara PorceddaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, 09042 Monserrato, Italy.
Rafaela MostallinoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, 09042 Monserrato, Italy.
Franca PirasDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, 09042 Monserrato, Italy.
Cristina MilianoSchool of Neuroscience, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4042-468X
Maria Antonietta De LucaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, 09042 Monserrato, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2647-4859
M Paola CastelliDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, 09042 Monserrato, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3249-4706
University of Cagliari · ITVirginia Tech · US

Funding

Drug Policies Department, Presidency of the Council of Ministers, Italy project: "Effects of NPS: development of a multicentre research for the information enhancement of the Early Warning System"European Commission Grant agreement n. 806996-JUSTSORegione Autonoma della Sardegna RC_CRP_034; CUP RASSR03071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Novel psychoactive substances (NPS) are synthetic substances belonging to diverse groups, designed to mimic the effects of scheduled drugs, resulting in altered toxicity and potency. Up to now, information available on the pharmacology and toxicology of these new substances is very limited, posing a considerable challenge for prevention and treatment. The present in vitro study investigated the possible mechanisms of toxicity of two emerging NPS (i) 4'-methyl-alpha-pyrrolidinoexanophenone (3,4-MDPHP), a synthetic cathinone, and (ii) 2-chloro-4,5-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (2-Cl-4,5-MDMA), a phenethylamine. In addition, to apply our model to the class of synthetic opioids, we evaluated the toxicity of fentanyl, as a reference compound for this group of frequently abused substances. To this aim, the in vitro toxic effects of these three compounds were evaluated in dopaminergic-differentiated SH-SY5Y cells. Following 24 h of exposure, all compounds induced a loss of viability, and oxidative stress in a concentration-dependent manner. 2-Cl-4,5-MDMA activates apoptotic processes, while 3,4-MDPHP elicits cell death by necrosis. Fentanyl triggers cell death through both mechanisms. Increased expression levels of pro-apoptotic Bax and caspase 3 activity were observed following 2-Cl-4,5-MDMA and fentanyl, but not 3,4-MDPHP exposure, confirming the different modes of cell death.

Indexed as

ApoptosisApoptosis Regulatory ProteinsBiomarkersCell LineCell Line, TumorCells, CulturedDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalGene Expression RegulationHumansMolecular StructureNeuronsPsychotropic DrugsStructure-Activity RelationshipApoptosis Regulatory ProteinsBiomarkersPsychotropic DrugsapoptosisBax and Bcl2 expressioncathinonecytotoxicitydopaminergic cellsfentanyloxidative stressphenethylamine

Identifiers

PMID34202634
PMCPMC8268582
OpenAlexW3174925764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.