Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34202604›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2021

Magnetic Nanoparticles in Biology and Medicine: Past, Present, and Future Trends.

Deanna D Stueber, Jake Villanova, Itzel Aponte, Zhen Xiao, Vicki L Colvin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Direct Effect of Magnetic TapeSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Targeting prostate adenocarcinoma tumor microenvironment via cancer nanotheranostics: a comprehensive update on improved roadmap for disease diagnosis, therapy and management.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Deanna D StueberCenter for Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, Brown University, 171 Meeting Street, Providence, RI 02912, USA.
Jake VillanovaCenter for Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, Brown University, 171 Meeting Street, Providence, RI 02912, USA.
Itzel AponteCenter for Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, Brown University, 171 Meeting Street, Providence, RI 02912, USA.
Zhen XiaoDepartment of Chemistry, Brown University, 324 Brook Street, Providence, RI 02912, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3740-3546
Vicki L ColvinCenter for Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, Brown University, 171 Meeting Street, Providence, RI 02912, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of magnetism in medicine has changed dramatically since its first application by the ancient Greeks in 624 BC. Now, by leveraging magnetic nanoparticles, investigators have developed a range of modern applications that use external magnetic fields to manipulate biological systems. Drug delivery systems that incorporate these particles can target therapeutics to specific tissues without the need for biological or chemical cues. Once precisely located within an organism, magnetic nanoparticles can be heated by oscillating magnetic fields, which results in localized inductive heating that can be used for thermal ablation or more subtle cellular manipulation. Biological imaging can also be improved using magnetic nanoparticles as contrast agents; several types of iron oxide nanoparticles are US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved for use in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as contrast agents that can improve image resolution and information content. New imaging modalities, such as magnetic particle imaging (MPI), directly detect magnetic nanoparticles within organisms, allowing for background-free imaging of magnetic particle transport and collection. "Lab-on-a-chip" technology benefits from the increased control that magnetic nanoparticles provide over separation, leading to improved cellular separation. Magnetic separation is also becoming important in next-generation immunoassays, in which particles are used to both increase sensitivity and enable multiple analyte detection. More recently, the ability to manipulate material motion with external fields has been applied in magnetically actuated soft robotics that are designed for biomedical interventions. In this review article, the origins of these various areas are introduced, followed by a discussion of current clinical applications, as well as emerging trends in the study and application of these materials.

Indexed as

drug deliverygene deliveryiron oxidemagnetic nanoparticlesmagnetic particle imagingmagnetic resonance imagingmagnetic separationmagnetothermal heatingmicrofluidicssuperparamagnetic

Identifiers

PMID34202604
PMCPMC8309177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.