Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34202445›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Accuracy-Risk Trade-Off Due to Social Learning in Crowd-Sourced Financial Predictions.

Dhaval Adjodah, Yan Leng, Shi Kai Chong, P M Krafft, Esteban Moro, Alex Pentland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dhaval AdjodahMedia Lab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1777-7222
Yan LengMcCombs School of Business, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Shi Kai ChongMedia Lab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
P M KrafftOxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK.
Esteban MoroDepartamento de Matemáticas & GISC, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 28911 Leganes, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2894-1024
Alex PentlandMedia Lab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8053-9983

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A critical question relevant to the increasing importance of crowd-sourced-based finance is how to optimize collective information processing and decision-making. Here, we investigate an often under-studied aspect of the performance of online traders: beyond focusing on just accuracy, what gives rise to the trade-off between risk and accuracy at the collective level? Answers to this question will lead to designing and deploying more effective crowd-sourced financial platforms and to minimizing issues stemming from risk such as implied volatility. To investigate this trade-off, we conducted a large online Wisdom of the Crowd study where 2037 participants predicted the prices of real financial assets (S&P 500, WTI Oil and Gold prices). Using the data collected, we modeled the belief update process of participants using models inspired by Bayesian models of cognition. We show that subsets of predictions chosen based on their belief update strategies lie on a Pareto frontier between accuracy and risk, mediated by social learning. We also observe that social learning led to superior accuracy during one of our rounds that occurred during the high market uncertainty of the Brexit vote.

Indexed as

Bayesian modelscrowd-sourcingrisksocial learningwisdom of the crowd

Identifiers

PMID34202445
PMCPMC8307866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.