Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34202435›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2021

Eliciting and Recording Event Related Potentials (ERPs) in Behaviourally Unresponsive Populations: A Retrospective Commentary on Critical Factors.

Alexander Rokos, Richard Mah, Rober Boshra, Amabilis Harrison, Tsee Leng Choy, Stefanie Blain-Moraes, John F Connolly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexander RokosIntegrated Program in Neuroscience, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5065-203X
Richard MahDepartment of Linguistics and Languages, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4M2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2121-5185
Rober BoshraSchool of Biomedical Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada.
Amabilis HarrisonImaging Research Centre, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON L8N 4A6, Canada.
Tsee Leng ChoyMcMaster Integrative Neuroscience Discovery & Study (MiNDS), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada.
Stefanie Blain-MoraesSchool of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3G 1Y5, Canada.
John F ConnollyCentre for Advanced Research in Experimental and Applied Linguistics, Department of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8869-5369

Funding

Canada Foundation for Innovation 20889Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2016-03817
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A consistent limitation when designing event-related potential paradigms and interpreting results is a lack of consideration of the multivariate factors that affect their elicitation and detection in behaviorally unresponsive individuals. This paper provides a retrospective commentary on three factors that influence the presence and morphology of long-latency event-related potentials-the P3b and N400. We analyze event-related potentials derived from electroencephalographic (EEG) data collected from small groups of healthy youth and healthy elderly to illustrate the effect of paradigm strength and subject age; we analyze ERPs collected from an individual with severe traumatic brain injury to illustrate the effect of stimulus presentation speed. Based on these critical factors, we support that: (1) the strongest paradigms should be used to elicit event-related potentials in unresponsive populations; (2) interpretation of event-related potential results should account for participant age; and (3) speed of stimulus presentation should be slower in unresponsive individuals. The application of these practices when eliciting and recording event-related potentials in unresponsive individuals will help to minimize result interpretation ambiguity, increase confidence in conclusions, and advance the understanding of the relationship between long-latency event-related potentials and states of consciousness.

Indexed as

disorders of consciousnesselectroencephalographyevent related potentialsN400P3b

Identifiers

PMID34202435
PMCPMC8301772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.