Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34202410›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2021

Using System Identification to Construct an Inherent Model of Pupillary Light Reflex to Explore Diabetic Neuropathy.

Yung-Jhe Yan, Chien-Nan Chen, Mang Ou-Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yung-Jhe YanInstitute of Electrical and Control Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-0944-7258
Chien-Nan ChenInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan.
Mang Ou-YangInstitute of Electrical and Control Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-2108-1765

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST 105-2221-E-009 -082Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST107-2221-E009-155Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST108-2221-E009-125Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST 109-2321-B009-008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study proposed a pupillary light reflex (PLR) inherent model based on the system identification method to demonstrate the dynamic physiological mechanism of the PLR, in which pupillary constriction and dilation are controlled by the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system. This model was constructed and verified by comparing the simulated and predicted PLR response with that of healthy participants. The least root-mean-square error (RMSE) of simulated PLR response was less than 0.7% when stimulus duration was under 3 ms. The RMSE of predicted PLR response increased by approximately 6.76%/s from the stimulus duration of 1 ms to 3 s, when the model directly used the parameters extracted from the PLR at the stimulus duration of 10 ms. When model parameters were derived from the regression by the measured PLR response, the RMSE kept under 8.5%. The model was applied to explore the PLR abnormalities of the people with Diabetic Mellitus (DM) by extracting the model parameters from 42 people with DM and comparing these parameters with those of 42 healthy participants. The parameter in the first-order term of the elastic force of the participants with DM was significantly lower than that of the healthy participants (

Indexed as

autonomic nervous systembiological system modelingdiabetic autonomic neuropathypupillary light reflexsystem identification

Identifiers

PMID34202410
PMCPMC8301861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.