ReviewCancers2021
Requirements for Designing an Effective Metallic Nanoparticle (NP)-Boosted Radiation Therapy (RT).
Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Baicalin: A comprehensive review of its molecular mechanisms and pharmacological activities.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- Exploring the Potential of Gold Nanoparticles in Proton Therapy: Mechanisms, Advances, and Clinical Horizons.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- An overview of the feasibility of nanomedicine in pancreatic cancer theranostics.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2025Review
- Application of nano-radiosensitizers in combination cancer therapy.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2023Review
- Recent Advances in Metal-Based NanoEnhancers for Particle Therapy.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Recent Metal Nanotheranostics for Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy: A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Nanoscopic biodosimetry using plasmid DNA in radiotherapy with metallic nanoparticles.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Review
- New Frontiers in Colorectal Cancer Treatment Combining Nanotechnology with Photo- and Radiotherapy.Cancers · 2023Review
- Albumin-Modified Gold Nanoparticles as Novel Radiosensitizers for Enhancing Lung Cancer Radiotherapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2023Article
- Gold Nanoparticles Enhancing Generation of ROS for Cs-137 Radiotherapy.Nanoscale research letters · 2022Article
- Biological Response of Human Cancer Cells to Ionizing Radiation in Combination with Gold Nanoparticles.Cancers · 2022Article
- NVCL-Based Galacto-Functionalized and Thermosensitive Nanogels with GNRDs for Chemo/Photothermal-Therapy.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- The Effect of Hypoxia on Relative Biological Effectiveness and Oxygen Enhancement Ratio for Cells Irradiated with Grenz Rays.Cancers · 2022Article
- Incorporation of Low Concentrations of Gold Nanoparticles: Complex Effects on Radiation Response and Fate of Cancer Cells.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Nano-Drug Delivery Systems Entrapping Natural Bioactive Compounds for Cancer: Recent Progress and Future Challenges.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many different tumor-targeted strategies are under development worldwide to limit the side effects and improve the effectiveness of cancer therapies. One promising method is to enhance the radiosensitization of the cancer cells while reducing or maintaining the normal tissue complication probability during radiation therapy using metallic nanoparticles (NPs). Radiotherapy with MV photons is more commonly available and applied in cancer clinics than high LET particle radiotherapy, so the addition of high-Z NPs has the potential to further increase the efficacy of photon radiotherapy in terms of NP radiosensitization. Generally, when using X-rays, mainly the inner electron shells are ionized, which creates cascades of both low and high energy Auger electrons. When using high LET particles, mainly the outer shells are ionized, which give electrons with lower energies than when using X-rays. The amount of the produced low energy electrons is higher when exposing NPs to heavy charged particles than when exposing them to X-rays. Since ions traverse the material along tracks, and therefore give rise to a much more inhomogeneous dose distributions than X-rays, there might be a need to introduce a higher number of NPs when using ions compared to when using X-rays to create enough primary and secondary electrons to get the desired dose escalations. This raises the questions of toxicity. This paper provides a review of the fundamental processes controlling the outcome of metallic NP-boosted photon beam and ion beam radiation therapy and presents some experimental procedures to study the biological effects of NPs' radiosensitization. The overview shows the need for more systematic studies of the behavior of NPs when exposed to different kinds of ionizing radiation before applying metallic-based NPs in clinical practice to improve the effect of IR therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.