Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34202206›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2021

Bovine Colostrum Applications in Sick and Healthy People: A Systematic Review.

Monica Guberti, Stefano Botti, Maria Teresa Capuzzo, Sara Nardozi, Andrea Fusco, Andrea Cera, Laura Dugo, Michela Piredda, Maria Grazia De Marinis

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Monica GubertiResearch and EBP Unit, Health Professions Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Via Amendola, 2-42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4393-1027
Stefano BottiHematology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Via Amendola, 2-42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0678-0242
Maria Teresa CapuzzoDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via di Montpellier, 1-00133 Rome, Italy.
Sara NardoziDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via di Montpellier, 1-00133 Rome, Italy.
Andrea FuscoResearch and EBP Unit, Health Professions Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Via Amendola, 2-42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Andrea CeraASST-Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale di Mantova, Strada Lago Paiolo, 10-46100 Mantova, Italy.
Laura DugoUnit of Food Science and Nutrition, Department of Science and Technology for Humans and the Environment, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21-00128 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5527-0364
Michela PireddaResearch Unit Nursing Science, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21-00128 Rome, Italy.
Maria Grazia De MarinisResearch Unit Nursing Science, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21-00128 Rome, Italy.
University of Rome Tor Vergata · ITAzienda Sanitaria Unità Locale di Reggio Emilia · ITUniversità Campus Bio-Medico · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Lariana · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colostrum is the first secretion of mammalian glands during the early period after birth giving. Its components are biologically active and have beneficial effects on new-born growth and well-being. Bovine colostrum has the highest concentration of these substances and its supplementation or application may provide health benefits. This systematic review was conducted to update current knowledge on bovine colostrum effects including all administration routes on healthy and sick subjects. Full texts or abstracts of twenty-eight papers as reports of systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, observational studies and case series were included after searches in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Cinahl databases. The full texts of selected studies were assessed for quality using validated tools and their results were summarized in different categories. Studies were highly heterogeneous as regards to population, intervention, outcome and risk of bias. Bovine colostrum topical application was shown effective on vaginal dryness related symptoms limitation. Its use as food supplement showed interesting effects preventing upper respiratory illness in sportsmen, modulating immune system response and reducing intestinal permeability in healthy and sick subjects. Conflicting results were provided in pediatric population and little evidence is available on its use with older adults. Further studies are mandatory to better understand all factors influencing its activity.

Indexed as

ColostrumDietary SupplementsAdultAgedAnimalsCattleChildFemaleHumansMaleNutritional Physiological PhenomenaPregnancybovine colostrumfood supplementationhealth improvementimmune systemmilkphysical performancesystematic reviewwhey

Identifiers

PMID34202206
PMCPMC8308243
OpenAlexW3175584833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.