Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34202087›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

An Umbrella Review of the Work and Health Impacts of Working in an Epidemic/Pandemic Environment.

Jonathan Fan, Sonja Senthanar, Robert A Macpherson, Kimberly Sharpe, Cheryl E Peters, Mieke Koehoorn, Christopher B McLeod

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. The Mediating Role of Resilience in the Relationship between Perceived Stress and Mental Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jonathan FanSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.
Sonja SenthanarSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.
Robert A MacphersonSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6625-5570
Kimberly SharpeSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.
Cheryl E PetersCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.
Mieke KoehoornSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.
Christopher B McLeodSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9268-3694

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This umbrella review of reviews examined the evidence on the work and health impacts of working in an epidemic/pandemic environment, factors associated with these impacts, and risk mitigation or intervention strategies that address these factors. We examined review articles published in MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Embase between 2000 and 2020. Data extracted from the included reviews were analyzed using a narrative synthesis. The search yielded 1524 unique citations, of which 31 were included. Included studies were focused on health care workers and the risk of infection to COVID-19 or other respiratory illnesses, mental health outcomes, and health care workers' willingness to respond during a public health event. Reviews identified a variety of individual, social, and organizational factors associated with these work and health outcomes as well as risk mitigation strategies that addressed study outcomes. Only a few reviews examined intervention strategies in the workplace such as physical distancing and quarantine, and none included long-term outcomes of exposure or work during an epidemic/pandemic. Findings suggest a number of critical research and evidence gaps, including the need for reviews on occupational groups potentially exposed to or impacted by the negative work and health effects of COVID-19 in addition to health care workers, the long-term consequences of transitioning to the post-COVID-19 economy on work and health, and research with an equity or social determinants of health lens.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsHealth PersonnelHumansQuarantineSARS-CoV-2COVID-19mental health and well-beingoccupational healthpandemicsystematic reviewwork and health

Identifiers

PMID34202087
PMCPMC8297139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.