Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34201964›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Does Anatomical Contextual Information Improve 3D U-Net-Based Brain Tumor Segmentation?

Iulian Emil Tampu, Neda Haj-Hosseini, Anders Eklund

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Body Location Embedded 3D U-Net (BLE-U-Net) for Ovarian Cancer Ascites Segmentation on CT scans.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Iulian Emil TampuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7582-1706
Neda Haj-HosseiniDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0555-8877
Anders EklundDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7061-7995

Funding

Åke Wiberg Stiftelse M20-0031Analytic Imaging Diagnostics Arena 2017-02447IMPACT 2018-02230Linkoping University Cancer organization 2020-2021Swedish Research Council 2018-05250
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective, robust, and automatic tools for brain tumor segmentation are needed for the extraction of information useful in treatment planning. Recently, convolutional neural networks have shown remarkable performance in the identification of tumor regions in magnetic resonance (MR) images. Context-aware artificial intelligence is an emerging concept for the development of deep learning applications for computer-aided medical image analysis. A large portion of the current research is devoted to the development of new network architectures to improve segmentation accuracy by using context-aware mechanisms. In this work, it is investigated whether or not the addition of contextual information from the brain anatomy in the form of white matter (WM), gray matter (GM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) masks and probability maps improves U-Net-based brain tumor segmentation. The BraTS2020 dataset was used to train and test two standard 3D U-Net (nnU-Net) models that, in addition to the conventional MR image modalities, used the anatomical contextual information as extra channels in the form of binary masks (CIM) or probability maps (CIP). For comparison, a baseline model (BLM) that only used the conventional MR image modalities was also trained. The impact of adding contextual information was investigated in terms of overall segmentation accuracy, model training time, domain generalization, and compensation for fewer MR modalities available for each subject. Median (mean) Dice scores of 90.2 (81.9), 90.2 (81.9), and 90.0 (82.1) were obtained on the official BraTS2020 validation dataset (125 subjects) for BLM, CIM, and CIP, respectively. Results show that there is no statistically significant difference when comparing Dice scores between the baseline model and the contextual information models (

Indexed as

3D U-Netanatomical contextual informationartificial intelligenceautomatic segmentationhigh grade gliomalow grade glioma

Identifiers

PMID34201964
PMCPMC8306843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.