Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34201859›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Entropy of Badminton Strike Positions.

Javier Galeano, Miguel-Ángel Gomez, Fernando Rivas, Javier M Buldú

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Javier GaleanoComplex System Group, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0706-4317
Miguel-Ángel GomezDepartment of Social Sciences, Physical Activity, Sport and Leisure, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28031 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9585-3158
Fernando RivasSpanish Badminton Federation, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7327-3312
Javier M BuldúComplex System Group & GISC, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28933 Móstoles, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9345-599X

Funding

Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Gobierno de España DEP2015-67231-RMinisterio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Gobierno de España FIS2017-84151-P
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the current study was twofold: (i) to investigate the distribution of the strike positions of badminton players while quantifying the corresponding standard entropy and using an alternative metric (spatial entropy) related to winning and losing points and random positions; and (ii) to evaluate the standard entropy of the receiving positions. With the datasets of 259 badminton matches, we focused on the positions of players' strokes and the outcome of each point. First, we identified those regions of the court from which hits were most likely to be struck. Second, we computed the standard entropy of stroke positions, and then the spatial entropy, which also considers the order and clustering of the hitting locations in a two-dimensional Euclidean space. Both entropy quantifiers revealed high uncertainty in the striking position; however, specific court locations (i.e., the four corners) are preferred over the rest. When the outcome of each point was taken into account, we observed that the hitting patterns with lower entropy were associated with higher probabilities of winning points. On the contrary, players striking from more random positions were more prone to losing the points.

Indexed as

match analysisperformanceracket sportsshannon entropyspatial entropy

Identifiers

PMID34201859
PMCPMC8304171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.