ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Autonomous Collision Avoidance Using MPC with LQR-Based Weight Transformation.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Autonomous emergency braking optimal coordination control strategy for commercial buses considering safety and comfort.PloS one · 2026Article
- USV Trajectory Tracking Control Based on Receding Horizon Reinforcement Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Nonlinear Model Predictive Impedance Control of a Fully Actuated Hexarotor for Physical Interaction.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Multi-Ship Control and Collision Avoidance Using MPC and RBF-Based Trajectory Predictions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- A Variable-Sampling Time Model Predictive Control Algorithm for Improving Path-Tracking Performance of a Vehicle.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Model predictive control (MPC) is a multi-objective control technique that can handle system constraints. However, the performance of an MPC controller highly relies on a proper prioritization weight for each objective, which highlights the need for a precise weight tuning technique. In this paper, we propose an analytical tuning technique by matching the MPC controller performance with the performance of a linear quadratic regulator (LQR) controller. The proposed methodology derives the transformation of a LQR weighting matrix with a fixed weighting factor using a discrete algebraic Riccati equation (DARE) and designs an MPC controller using the idea of a discrete time linear quadratic tracking problem (LQT) in the presence of constraints. The proposed methodology ensures optimal performance between unconstrained MPC and LQR controllers and provides a sub-optimal solution while the constraints are active during transient operations. The resulting MPC behaves as the discrete time LQR by selecting an appropriate weighting matrix in the MPC control problem and ensures the asymptotic stability of the system. In this paper, the effectiveness of the proposed technique is investigated in the application of a novel vehicle collision avoidance system that is designed in the form of linear inequality constraints within MPC. The simulation results confirm the potency of the proposed MPC control technique in performing a safe, feasible and collision-free path while respecting the inputs, states and collision avoidance constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.