Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34201769›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Hybrid Methacrylated Gelatin and Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogel Scaffolds. Preparation and Systematic Characterization for Prospective Tissue Engineering Applications.

B Velasco-Rodriguez, T Diaz-Vidal, L C Rosales-Rivera, C A García-González, C Alvarez-Lorenzo, A Al-Modlej, V Domínguez-Arca, G Prieto, S Barbosa, J F A Soltero Martínez and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 163 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

B Velasco-RodriguezDepartment of Chemical Engineering, CUCEI, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara 44430, Mexico.
T Diaz-VidalDepartment of Chemical Engineering, CUCEI, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara 44430, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-9110-5147
L C Rosales-RiveraDepartment of Chemical Engineering, CUCEI, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara 44430, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-1637-0642
C A García-GonzálezDepartment of Pharmacology, Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology, I + D Farma Group (GI-1645), Faculty of Pharmacy and Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, E-15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9542-3679
C Alvarez-LorenzoDepartment of Pharmacology, Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology, I + D Farma Group (GI-1645), Faculty of Pharmacy and Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, E-15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8546-7085
A Al-ModlejDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
V Domínguez-ArcaBiophysics and Interfaces Group, Department of Applied Physics, Faculty of Physics, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, E-15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3500-5915
G PrietoBiophysics and Interfaces Group, Department of Applied Physics, Faculty of Physics, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, E-15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3010-7197
S BarbosaColloids and Polymers Physics Group, Department of Particle Physics, Faculty of Physics and Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, E-15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1831-1686
J F A Soltero MartínezDepartment of Chemical Engineering, CUCEI, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara 44430, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-7793-8070
P TaboadaColloids and Polymers Physics Group, Department of Particle Physics, Faculty of Physics and Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, E-15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2903-7857
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela · ESUniversidad de Guadalajara · MXKing Saud University · SA

Funding

Agencia Estatal de Investigación MAT2016-8266RAgencia Estatal de Investigación PID2019-109517RB-I00,Consellería de Cultura, Educación e Ordenación Universitaria, Xunta de Galicia ED431C 2018/26Consellería de Cultura, Educación e Ordenación Universitaria, Xunta de Galicia ED431C 2020/17International Scientific Partnership Program ISSP at King Saud University ISPP-144
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hyaluronic acid (HA) and gelatin (Gel) are major components of the extracellular matrix of different tissues, and thus are largely appealing for the construction of hybrid hydrogels to combine the favorable characteristics of each biopolymer, such as the gel adhesiveness of Gel and the better mechanical strength of HA, respectively. However, despite previous studies conducted so far, the relationship between composition and scaffold structure and physico-chemical properties has not been completely and systematically established. In this work, pure and hybrid hydrogels of methacroyl-modified HA (HAMA) and Gel (GelMA) were prepared by UV photopolymerization and an extensive characterization was done to elucidate such correlations. Methacrylation degrees of ca. 40% and 11% for GelMA and HAMA, respectively, were obtained, which allows to improve the hydrogels' mechanical properties. Hybrid GelMA/HAMA hydrogels were stiffer, with elastic modulus up to ca. 30 kPa, and porous (up to 91%) compared with pure GelMA ones at similar GelMA concentrations thanks to the interaction between HAMA and GelMA chains in the polymeric matrix. The progressive presence of HAMA gave rise to scaffolds with more disorganized, stiffer, and less porous structures owing to the net increase of mass in the hydrogel compositions. HAMA also made hybrid hydrogels more swellable and resistant to collagenase biodegradation. Hence, the suitable choice of polymeric composition allows to regulate the hydrogels´ physical properties to look for the most optimal characteristics required for the intended tissue engineering application.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsGelatinHumansHyaluronic AcidHydrogelsMethacrylatesPolymersTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible MaterialsGelatinHyaluronic AcidHydrogelsMethacrylatesPolymersgelatinhyaluronic acidhybrid scaffoldshydrogelporositytissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID34201769
PMCPMC8268476
OpenAlexW3175388092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.