Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34201555›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Development and Psychometric Assessment of the Problematic QQ Use Scale among Adolescents.

Jintao Liu, Md Zahir Ahmed, Oli Ahmed, Mark D Griffiths, Lili Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Narcissism and Social Media: The Role of Communal Narcissism.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jintao LiuResearch Center for Urban Social Psychology, School of Education, Lanzhou City University, Lanzhou 730070, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8210-5812
Md Zahir AhmedSchool of Psychology, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9281-1262
Oli AhmedDepartment of Psychology, University of Chittagong, Chattogram 4331, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0001-8540-8037
Mark D GriffithsPsychology Department, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG1 4FQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8880-6524
Lili ChenSchool of Psychology, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The QQ social media platform is very popular among Chinese adolescents. As with other social media platforms (e.g., Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, etc.), there have been increasing reports that the use of QQ can be potentially problematic to a minority of users. However, unlike these other social media platforms, there is currently no scale to assess the risk of problematic QQ use. The present study developed the Problematic QQ Use Scale (PQQUS) among Chinese adolescents based on six core criteria of behavioral addiction (salience, tolerance, mood modification, loss of control, withdrawal, and conflict) that have been used in the development of other social media addiction scales. The scale was administered to a sample of 1008 Chinese school children to assess its psychometric properties, utilizing both classical test theory and item response theory. The analysis demonstrated that the PQQUS had good item discrimination indices relating to both CTT and IRT. The CFA results and Loevinger's

Indexed as

Behavior, AddictiveSocial MediaAdolescentAnxietyChildFemaleHumansMalePsychometricsReproducibility of Resultsproblematic QQ useProblematic QQ Use Scalepsychometricssocial media use

Identifiers

PMID34201555
PMCPMC8268458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.