Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34201549›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Laboratory Demand Management Strategies-An Overview.

Cornelia Mrazek, Elisabeth Haschke-Becher, Thomas K Felder, Martin H Keppel, Hannes Oberkofler, Janne Cadamuro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Blood tests - too much of a good thing.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cornelia MrazekDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Elisabeth Haschke-BecherDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Thomas K FelderDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8266-5513
Martin H KeppelDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Hannes OberkoflerDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Janne CadamuroDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6200-9831

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inappropriate laboratory test selection in the form of overutilization as well as underutilization frequently occurs despite available guidelines. There is broad approval among laboratory specialists as well as clinicians that demand management strategies are useful tools to avoid this issue. Most of these tools are based on automated algorithms or other types of machine learning. This review summarizes the available demand management strategies that may be adopted to local settings. We believe that artificial intelligence may help to further improve these available tools.

Indexed as

appropriate laboratory test orderingoverutilizationpre-analytical phaseunderutilization

Identifiers

PMID34201549
PMCPMC8305334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.