Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34201377›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Calibration Method for Particulate Matter Low-Cost Sensors Used in Ambient Air Quality Monitoring and Research.

Janani Venkatraman Jagatha, André Klausnitzer, Miriam Chacón-Mateos, Bernd Laquai, Evert Nieuwkoop, Peter van der Mark, Ulrich Vogt, Christoph Schneider

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Particulate matter 1µm (PMData in brief · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Janani Venkatraman JagathaGeography Department, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, D-10099 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3609-6986
André KlausnitzerGeography Department, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, D-10099 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1579-6238
Miriam Chacón-MateosDepartment of Flue Gas Cleaning and Air Quality Control, Institute of Combustion and Power Plant Technology (IFK), University of Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 23, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6370-8589
Bernd LaquaiDepartment of Flue Gas Cleaning and Air Quality Control, Institute of Combustion and Power Plant Technology (IFK), University of Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 23, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.
Evert NieuwkoopNetherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research, Anna van Buerenplein 1, 2595 DA The Hague, The Netherlands.
Peter van der MarkNetherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research, Anna van Buerenplein 1, 2595 DA The Hague, The Netherlands.
Ulrich VogtDepartment of Flue Gas Cleaning and Air Quality Control, Institute of Combustion and Power Plant Technology (IFK), University of Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 23, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.
Christoph SchneiderGeography Department, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, D-10099 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9914-3217

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01LP1602BBundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01LP1912BUmweltbundesamt 3718-51-240-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last decade, manufacturers have come forth with cost-effective sensors for measuring ambient and indoor particulate matter concentration. What these sensors make up for in cost efficiency, they lack in reliability of the measured data due to their sensitivities to temperature and relative humidity. These weaknesses are especially evident when it comes to portable or mobile measurement setups. In recent years many studies have been conducted to assess the possibilities and limitations of these sensors, however mostly restricted to stationary measurements. This study reviews the published literature until 2020 on cost-effective sensors, summarizes the recommendations of experts in the field based on their experiences, and outlines the quantile-mapping methodology to calibrate low-cost sensors in mobile applications. Compared to the commonly used linear regression method, quantile mapping retains the spatial characteristics of the measurements, although a common correction factor cannot be determined. We conclude that quantile mapping can be a useful calibration methodology for mobile measurements given a well-elaborated measurement plan assures providing the necessary data.

Indexed as

Air PollutantsAir PollutionCalibrationEnvironmental MonitoringParticulate MatterReproducibility of ResultsAir PollutantsParticulate Matterair pollutionlow-cost sensorsmobile measurementsparticulate matterquantile mapping

Identifiers

PMID34201377
PMCPMC8228976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.