Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34201213›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Application of a Scorecard Tool for Assessing and Engaging Media on Responsible Reporting of Suicide-Related News in India.

Lakshmi Vijayakumar, Manisha Shastri, Tanya Nicole Fernandes, Yash Bagra, Aaryaman Pathare, Arpita Patel, Padam Jain, Yesha Merchant, Gregory Armstrong, Soumitra Pathare

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lakshmi VijayakumarDepartment of Psychiatry, Voluntary Health Services and SNEHA Suicide Prevention Centre, Tamil Nadu 600017, India.
Manisha ShastriCentre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune 411004, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1644-7566
Tanya Nicole FernandesCentre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune 411004, India.
Yash BagraCentre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune 411004, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6461-6013
Aaryaman PathareCentre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune 411004, India.
Arpita PatelCentre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune 411004, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3234-1646
Padam JainCentre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune 411004, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5603-9161
Yesha MerchantCentre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune 411004, India.
Gregory ArmstrongMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, Nossal Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8073-9213
Soumitra PathareCentre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune 411004, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9311-9024

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEach year there are more than 800,000 deaths by suicide across the world, while India alone accounts for one third of female suicides and one fourth of male suicides worldwide. Responsible media reporting of suicide is an important suicide prevention intervention at the population level. There is sufficient evidence to show that the way suicide is reported and portrayed in the media can have a significant impact on individuals experiencing suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Recognizing the important role of the media in suicide prevention, the World Health Organization (WHO) issued guidelines for responsible reporting of suicides by the media. The Press Council of India, in 2019 endorsed WHO's guidelines for media reporting of suicides, however there is no evidence that the Indian media is complying with these guidelines.

methodsTo encourage responsible media reporting, we developed a scorecard to assess and rate media reports on suicide. We reviewed several resource documents that contained guidelines on responsible reporting of suicide. After consulting with a team of experts, we arrived at a scorecard that consisted of 10 positive and 10 negative parameters.

resultsWe applied the scorecard to 1318 reports on suicide from 9 English language newspapers, with the highest readership in India between the dates of 1 April to 30 June 2020. For the articles analyzed, the average positive score across all newspapers was 1.32 and the average negative score was 3.31. DISCUSSION: The scorecard can be a useful tool to assess media reports on suicide and provide metrics for the same. It can facilitate improved monitoring and engagement with media organizations, who can quickly check their own reporting compliance to the WHO guidelines and compare how well they are performing compared to their peers over time.

Indexed as

SuicideFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMass MediaSuicidal IdeationWorld Health Organizationmedia and suicidemedia reporting of suicidesuicidesuicide preventionWHO guidelines on responsible reporting of suicide

Identifiers

PMID34201213
PMCPMC8230035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.