Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34201052›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

In-Vivo LC-OCT Evaluation of the Downward Proliferation Pattern of Keratinocytes in Actinic Keratosis in Comparison with Histology: First Impressions from a Pilot Study.

Cristel Ruini, Sandra Schuh, Charlotte Gust, Daniela Hartmann, Lars Einar French, Elke Christina Sattler, Julia Welzel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. S1 guideline for imaging diagnostics for skin diseases.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Digital Dermatology.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Use of non-invasive optical imaging techniques in dermatology.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Non-Invasive Imaging in Post-Radiotherapy Monitoring of Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Clinical and Dermoscopic Diagnosis of Actinic Keratosis.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cristel RuiniDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 80337 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9860-1095
Sandra SchuhDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
Charlotte GustDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 80337 Munich, Germany.
Daniela HartmannDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 80337 Munich, Germany.
Lars Einar FrenchDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 80337 Munich, Germany.
Elke Christina SattlerDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 80337 Munich, Germany.
Julia WelzelDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 80337 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6099-7418

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is known that actinic keratoses (AKs) can progress to invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The histological PRO grading of AKs is based on the growth pattern of basal keratinocytes and relates to their progression risk. AKs can be non-invasively characterized by line-field confocal optical coherence tomography (LC-OCT). The aim of the study was to define criteria for an LC-OCT grading of AKs based on the PRO classification and to correlate it with its histological counterpart. To evaluate the interobserver agreement for the LC-OCT PRO classification, fifty AKs were imaged by LC-OCT and biopsied for histopathology. PRO histological grading was assessed by an expert consensus, while two evaluator groups separately performed LC-OCT grading on vertical sections. The agreement between LC-OCT and histological PRO grading was 75% for all lesions (weighted kappa 0.66, 95% CI 0.48-0.83,

Indexed as

actinic keratosisbedside histologydysplasiafield cancerizationkeratinocyte cancerline-field confocal optical coherence tomographynon-invasive diagnostics in dermatologyPROskin imaging

Identifiers

PMID34201052
PMCPMC8228287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.