Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34200873›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Cost-Effectiveness of an Exercise Programme That Provided Group or Individual Training to Reduce the Fall Risk in Healthy Community-Dwelling People Aged 65-80: A Secondary Data Analysis.

Isaac Aranda-Reneo, Laura Albornos-Muñoz, Manuel Rich-Ruiz, María Ángeles Cidoncha-Moreno, Ángeles Pastor-López, Teresa Moreno-Casbas, Otago Project Working Group

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Isaac Aranda-ReneoEconomics and Finance Department, Faculty of Social Science, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 45600 Talavera de la Reina, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7311-2615
Laura Albornos-MuñozNursing and Healthcare Research Unit (Investén-isciii), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5875-8728
Manuel Rich-RuizNursing and Healthcare Research Unit (Investén-isciii), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3317-267X
María Ángeles Cidoncha-MorenoNursing and Healthcare Research Unit (Investén-isciii), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1844-9415
Ángeles Pastor-LópezInstituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), Universidad de Córdoba (UCO), Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía (HURS), 14004 Cordoba, Spain.
Teresa Moreno-CasbasNursing and Healthcare Research Unit (Investén-isciii), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7808-4038
Otago Project Working Group
Instituto de Salud Carlos III · ESInstituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba · ESUniversity of Castilla-La Mancha · ES

Funding

Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI16/00821Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI16/01042Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI16/01159Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI16/01312Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI16/01316Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI16/01520Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI16/01649Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI16CIII/00031Regional Fund for Health Research (P. Vasco) 2016111005Regional Fund for Health Research (R. Murcia) FFIS17/AP/02/04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research has demonstrated that some exercise programs are effective for reducing fall rates in community-dwelling older people; however, the literature is limited in providing clear recommendations of individual or group training as a result of economic evaluation. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of the Otago Exercise Program (OEP) for reducing the fall risk in healthy, non-institutionalized older people. An economic evaluation of a multicenter, blinded, randomized, non-inferiority clinical trial was performed on 498 patients aged over 65 in primary care. Participants were randomly allocated to the treatment or control arms, and group or individual training. The program was delivered in primary healthcare settings and comprised five initial sessions, ongoing encouragement and support to exercise at home, and a reinforcement session after six months. Our hypothesis was that the patients who received the intervention would achieve better health outcomes and therefore need lower healthcare resources during the follow-up, thus, lower healthcare costs. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, which used the timed up and go test results as an effective measure for preventing falls. The secondary outcomes included differently validated tools that assessed the fall risk. The cost per patient was USD 51.28 lower for the group than the individual sessions in the control group, and the fall risk was 10% lower when exercises had a group delivery. The OEP program delivered in a group manner was superior to the individual method. We observed slight differences in the incremental cost estimations when using different tools to assess the risk of fall, but all of them indicated the dominance of the intervention group. The OEP group sessions were more cost-effective than the individual sessions, and the fall risk was 10% lower.

Indexed as

cost-effectivenessdirect healthcare costsolder adultsOtago Exercise Programrandomized controlled trialrisk fallshort physical performance batterytimed up and goTinetti

Identifiers

PMID34200873
PMCPMC8230501
OpenAlexW3167823278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.