Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34200866›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Coronary Computer Tomography Angiography in 2021-Acquisition Protocols, Tips and Tricks and Heading beyond the Possible.

Sorin Giusca, Moritz Schütz, Florian Kronbach, David Wolf, Peter Nunninger, Grigorios Korosoglou

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sorin GiuscaDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, GRN Hospital Weinheim, 69469 Weinheim, Germany.
Moritz SchützDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, GRN Hospital Weinheim, 69469 Weinheim, Germany.
Florian KronbachDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, GRN Hospital Weinheim, 69469 Weinheim, Germany.
David WolfDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, GRN Hospital Weinheim, 69469 Weinheim, Germany.
Peter NunningerPractice of Radiology, GRN Hospital Weinheim, 69469 Weinheim, Germany.
Grigorios KorosoglouDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, GRN Hospital Weinheim, 69469 Weinheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6038-2253
H.W. & J. Hector Stiftung · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent technological advances, together with an increasing body of evidence from randomized trials, have placed coronary computer tomography angiography (CCTA) in the center of the diagnostic workup of patients with coronary artery disease. The method was proven reliable in the diagnosis of relevant coronary artery stenosis. Furthermore, it can identify different stages of the atherosclerotic process, including early atherosclerotic changes of the coronary vessel wall, a quality not met by other non-invasive tests. In addition, newer computational software can measure the hemodynamic relevance (fractional flow reserve) of a certain stenosis. In addition, if required, information related to cardiac and valvular function can be provided with specific protocols. Importantly, recent trials have highlighted the prognostic relevance of CCTA in patients with coronary artery disease, which helped establishing CCTA as the first-line method for the diagnostic work-up of such patients in current guidelines. All this can be gathered in one relatively fast examination with minimal discomfort for the patient and, with newer machines, with very low radiation exposure. Herein, we provide an overview of the current technical aspects, indications, pitfalls, and new horizons with CCTA, providing examples from our own clinical practice.

Indexed as

CCTAchronic coronary syndromesdiagnosis coronary artery diseaseplaque analysisprognosisreview

Identifiers

PMID34200866
PMCPMC8230532
OpenAlexW3172468091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.