Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34200799›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Feasibility, Safety and Impact on Overall Survival of Awake Resection for Newly Diagnosed Supratentorial

Alessandro Moiraghi, Alexandre Roux, Sophie Peeters, Jean-Baptiste Pelletier, Marwan Baroud, Bénédicte Trancart, Catherine Oppenheim, Emmanuèle Lechapt, Chiara Benevello, Eduardo Parraga and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Alessandro MoiraghiDepartment of Neurosurgery, GHU Site Sainte-Anne, F-75014 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4569-5304
Alexandre RouxDepartment of Neurosurgery, GHU Site Sainte-Anne, F-75014 Paris, France.
Sophie PeetersDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9548-644X
Jean-Baptiste PelletierDepartment of Neurosurgery, CHU de Saint Etienne, 42270 Saint Etienne, France.
Marwan BaroudDepartment of Neurosurgery, CHU Notre Dame de Secours, Byblos, Lebanon.
Bénédicte TrancartDepartment of Neurosurgery, GHU Site Sainte-Anne, F-75014 Paris, France.
Catherine OppenheimDepartment of Neurosurgery, GHU Site Sainte-Anne, F-75014 Paris, France.
Emmanuèle LechaptUniversité de Paris, 102-108 rue de la Santé, F-75014 Paris, France.
Chiara BenevelloDepartment of Neurosurgery, GHU Site Sainte-Anne, F-75014 Paris, France.
Eduardo ParragaDepartment of Neurosurgery, GHU Site Sainte-Anne, F-75014 Paris, France.
Pascale VarletUniversité de Paris, 102-108 rue de la Santé, F-75014 Paris, France.
Fabrice ChrétienUniversité de Paris, 102-108 rue de la Santé, F-75014 Paris, France.
Edouard DezamisDepartment of Neurosurgery, GHU Site Sainte-Anne, F-75014 Paris, France.
Marc ZanelloDepartment of Neurosurgery, GHU Site Sainte-Anne, F-75014 Paris, France.
Johan PalludDepartment of Neurosurgery, GHU Site Sainte-Anne, F-75014 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1652-9844
Université Paris Cité · FRInserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Notre Dame des Secours · LBUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

UCLA Neurosurgery Research Training and Education ProgramR25NS079198 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LIAU, LINDA M · 2012 to 2021
$1.2M
NINDS NIH HHS R25 NS079198
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough awake resection using intraoperative cortico-subcortical functional brain mapping is the benchmark technique for diffuse gliomas within eloquent brain areas, it is still rarely proposed for IDH-wildtype glioblastomas. We have assessed the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of awake resection for IDH-wildtype glioblastomas.

methodsObservational single-institution cohort (2012-2018) of 453 adult patients harboring supratentorial IDH-wildtype glioblastomas who benefited from awake resection, from asleep resection, or from a biopsy. Case matching (1:1) criteria between the awake group and asleep group: gender, age, RTOG-RPA class, tumor side, location and volume and neurosurgeon experience.

resultsIn patients in the awake resection subgroup (

conclusionsAwake resection is safe, allows larger resections than asleep surgery, and positively impacts overall survival of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma in selected adult patients.

Indexed as

awake surgeryextent of resectionglioblastomaIDH-wildtypesurvival

Identifiers

PMID34200799
PMCPMC8230499
OpenAlexW3168816590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.