Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34200631›Full record

ReviewGenes2021

Challenges for

Rodrigo P Baptista, Garrett W Cooper, Jessica C Kissinger

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Advancing genomics for waterborne pathogen surveillance in Australia.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Molecular genetic characterization ofFrontiers in parasitology · 2025
    Article
  6. Molecular detection ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2024
    Article
  7. Current tropical medicine reports · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Exploratory Algorithm of a Multi-epitope-based Subunit Vaccine Candidate AgainstInternational journal of peptide research and therapeutics · 2022
    Article
  11. The Long and Short of Next Generation Sequencing forFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. An Update on ZoonoticAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  14. Food and waterborne parasitology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rodrigo P BaptistaCenter for Tropical and Emerging Global Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1806-8260
Garrett W CooperDepartment of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Jessica C KissingerCenter for Tropical and Emerging Global Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6413-1101
University of Georgia · US

Funding

NIH HHS 1R01AI148667-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cryptosporidiosis is ranked sixth in the list of the most important food-borne parasites globally, and it is an important contributor to mortality in infants and the immunosuppressed. Recently, the number of genome sequences available for this parasite has increased drastically. The majority of the sequences are derived from population studies of

Indexed as

Genetic VariationCryptosporidiosisCryptosporidiumGenotyping TechniquesHumansOocystscryptosporidiosisgenome evolutionmixed infectionsmolecular typingpopulation structure

Identifiers

PMID34200631
PMCPMC8229070
OpenAlexW3169961204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.