Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34200567›Full record

ArticleToxics2021

A Quantitative

Ines Barthlott, Andreas Scharinger, Patricia Golombek, Thomas Kuballa, Dirk W Lachenmeier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. NMR-Based Approaches in the Study of Foods.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ines BarthlottChemisches und Veterinäruntersuchungsamt (CVUA) Karlsruhe, Weißenburger Straße 3, 76187 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Andreas ScharingerChemisches und Veterinäruntersuchungsamt (CVUA) Karlsruhe, Weißenburger Straße 3, 76187 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Patricia GolombekChemisches und Veterinäruntersuchungsamt (CVUA) Karlsruhe, Weißenburger Straße 3, 76187 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Thomas KuballaChemisches und Veterinäruntersuchungsamt (CVUA) Karlsruhe, Weißenburger Straße 3, 76187 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Dirk W LachenmeierChemisches und Veterinäruntersuchungsamt (CVUA) Karlsruhe, Weißenburger Straße 3, 76187 Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3115-864X
Chemisches und Veterinäruntersuchungsamt Karlsruhe · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Toxicologically relevant levels of the psychoactive ∆

Indexed as

1H NMR∆8-tetrahydrocannabinol (∆8-THC)∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (∆9-THC)cannabidiol (CBD)cannabinoidscannabinol (CBN)CBD oilnuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR)PULCON methodologyqNMR

Identifiers

PMID34200567
PMCPMC8228318
OpenAlexW3171930427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.