Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34200487›Full record

ArticleMetabolites2021

Towards Standards for Human Fecal Sample Preparation in Targeted and Untargeted LC-HRMS Studies.

Farideh Hosseinkhani, Anne-Charlotte Dubbelman, Naama Karu, Amy C Harms, Thomas Hankemeier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolites, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. ComparativeFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  7. Therapeutic potential ofMicrobiome research reports · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Farideh HosseinkhaniLeiden Academic Center for Drug Research, Division of System Biomedicine and Pharmacology, Leiden University, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1880-6964
Anne-Charlotte DubbelmanLeiden Academic Center for Drug Research, Division of System Biomedicine and Pharmacology, Leiden University, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Naama KaruLeiden Academic Center for Drug Research, Division of System Biomedicine and Pharmacology, Leiden University, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8005-0726
Amy C HarmsLeiden Academic Center for Drug Research, Division of System Biomedicine and Pharmacology, Leiden University, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2931-4295
Thomas HankemeierLeiden Academic Center for Drug Research, Division of System Biomedicine and Pharmacology, Leiden University, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7871-2073
Leiden University · NL

Funding

Project 4 - Mechanistic studies on the role of the gut microbiome in models for Alzheimer's diseaseU19AG063744 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI ROB KNIGHT, Rima F Kaddurah-Daouk · 2019 to 2026
$54.1M
NIA NIH HHS 1U19AG063744-01NWO 184.034.019ZonMW Memorabel 733050814
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gut microbiota and their metabolic products are increasingly being recognized as important modulators of human health. The fecal metabolome provides a functional readout of the interactions between human metabolism and the gut microbiota in health and disease. Due to the high complexity of the fecal matrix, sample preparation often introduces technical variation, which must be minimized to accurately detect and quantify gut bacterial metabolites. Here, we tested six different representative extraction methods (single-phase and liquid-liquid extractions) and compared differences due to fecal amount, extraction solvent type and solvent pH. Our results indicate that a minimum fecal (wet) amount of 0.50 g is needed to accurately represent the complex texture of feces. The MTBE method (MTBE/methanol/water, 3.6/2.8/3.5,

Indexed as

fecal metabolitesgut microbiotaLCMS (liquid chromatography mass spectrometry)metabolomicssample preparation

Identifiers

PMID34200487
PMCPMC8230323
OpenAlexW3168901582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.