ReviewPolymers2021
Closing the Loop with Keratin-Rich Fibrous Materials.
Review in Polymers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multitechnique Physicochemical Characterization of Horse Hoof Trimmings as Sustainable and Untapped Keratin Source.ChemistryOpen · 2026Article
- Hydrothermal duck-feather keratin as a reagent-free bioreductant and capping matrix for bioactive silver nanoparticles.Discover nano · 2026Article
- Fermented Gallus gallus foot keratin-bone composites as peptide-mineral concentrate for aquafeed: ratio-dependent proximate compositional data.BMC research notes · 2026Article
- Ultrasound-Assisted alkaline hydrolysis of feather keratin using a cup horn sonoreactor.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2026Article
- Harnessing Microbial Consortia for Efficient Keratinous Biomass Biotransformation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Keratinase and its diverse applications.3 Biotech · 2025Review
- Keratinous bioresources: their generation, microbial degradation, and value enhancement for biotechnological applications.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Review
- Modifying Naturally Occurring, Nonmammalian-Sourced Biopolymers for Biomedical Applications.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2024Review
- Isolation, Selection, and Identification of Keratinolytic Bacteria for Green Management of Keratin Waste.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Turning Food Protein Waste into Sustainable Technologies.Chemical reviews · 2023Review
- Review
- Bioactive Low Molecular Weight Keratin Hydrolysates for Improving Skin Wound Healing.Polymers · 2022Article
- Keratinases as Versatile Enzymatic Tools for Sustainable Development.Biomolecules · 2021Review
- Wool Keratin Hydrolysates for Bioactive Additives Preparation.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
One of the agro-industry's side streams that is widely met is the-keratin rich fibrous material that is becoming a waste product without valorization. Its management as a waste is costly, as the incineration of this type of waste constitutes high environmental concern. Considering these facts, the keratin-rich waste can be considered as a treasure for the producers interested in the valorization of such slowly-biodegradable by-products. As keratin is a protein that needs harsh conditions for its degradation, and that in most of the cases its constitutive amino acids are destroyed, we review new extraction methods that are eco-friendly and cost-effective. The chemical and enzymatic extractions of keratin are compared and the optimization of the extraction conditions at the lab scale is considered. In this study, there are also considered the potential applications of the extracted keratin as well as the reuse of the by-products obtained during the extraction processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.