Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34200414›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Cryopreservation of Agronomic Plant Germplasm Using Vitrification-Based Methods: An Overview of Selected Case Studies.

Cesar Augusto Roque-Borda, Dariusz Kulus, Angela Vacaro de Souza, Behzad Kaviani, Eduardo Festozo Vicente

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Enhancing Cryopreservation Efficiency inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Comparative analysis ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Tracking Permeation of Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO) inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Plant Cell and Organism Development 2.0.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Cesar Augusto Roque-BordaSchool of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal 14884-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9262-0383
Dariusz KulusLaboratory of Ornamental Plants and Vegetable Crops, Faculty of Agriculture and Biotechnology, UTP University of Science and Technology in Bydgoszcz, Bernardyńska 6, 85-029 Bydgoszcz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5826-6950
Angela Vacaro de SouzaSchool of Sciences and Engineering, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Tupã 17602-496, SP, Brazil.
Behzad KavianiDepartment of Horticultural Science, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht 4147654919, Iran.
Eduardo Festozo VicenteSchool of Sciences and Engineering, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Tupã 17602-496, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9154-3574
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRBydgoszcz University of Science and Technology · PLIslamic Azad University Rasht Branch · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous environmental and endogenous factors affect the level of genetic diversity in natural populations. Genetic variability is the cornerstone of evolution and adaptation of species. However, currently, more and more plant species and local varieties (landraces) are on the brink of extinction due to anthropopression and climate change. Their preservation is imperative for the sake of future breeding programs. Gene banks have been created worldwide to conserve different plant species of cultural and economic importance. Many of them apply cryopreservation, a conservation method in which ultra-low temperatures (-135 °C to -196 °C) are used for long-term storage of tissue samples, with little risk of variation occurrence. Cells can be successfully cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen (LN) when the adverse effect of ice crystal formation and growth is mitigated by the removal of water and the formation of the so-called biological glass (vitrification). This state can be achieved in several ways. The involvement of key cold-regulated genes and proteins in the acquisition of cold tolerance in plant tissues may additionally improve the survival of LN-stored explants. The present review explains the importance of cryostorage in agronomy and presents an overview of the recent works accomplished with this strategy. The most widely used cryopreservation techniques, classic and modern cryoprotective agents, and some protocols applied in crops are considered to understand which parameters provide the establishment of high quality and broadly applicable cryopreservation. Attention is also focused on the issues of genetic integrity and functional genomics in plant cryobiology.

Indexed as

Plant BreedingVitrificationCrops, AgriculturalCryopreservationCryoprotective AgentsPlant ShootsProtoplastsSeedsCryoprotective Agentscryoprotectantdroplet-vitrificationencapsulation-dehydrationencapsulation-vitrificationgene banksgenetic integritymolecular markerssomaclonal variationvitrification

Identifiers

PMID34200414
PMCPMC8201202
OpenAlexW3169768344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.