Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34200378›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Comparison of ARIMA and LSTM in Forecasting the Incidence of HFMD Combined and Uncombined with Exogenous Meteorological Variables in Ningbo, China.

Rui Zhang, Zhen Guo, Yujie Meng, Songwang Wang, Shaoqiong Li, Ran Niu, Yu Wang, Qing Guo, Yonghong Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Landslide Displacement Prediction Based on Multivariate LSTM Model.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rui ZhangChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4859-2968
Zhen GuoInstitute of Medical Information and Library, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100020, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7454-0750
Yujie MengChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China.
Songwang WangChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China.
Shaoqiong LiChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China.
Ran NiuNational Institute for Nutrition and Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100050, China.
Yu WangNational Institute of Environmental Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100021, China.
Qing GuoChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China.
Yonghong LiNational Institute of Environmental Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100021, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5534-1644

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study intends to identify the best model for predicting the incidence of hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD) in Ningbo by comparing Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) and Long Short-Term Memory Neural Network (LSTM) models combined and uncombined with exogenous meteorological variables.

methodsThe data of daily HFMD incidence in Ningbo from January 2014 to November 2017 were set as the training set, and the data of December 2017 were set as the test set. ARIMA and LSTM models combined and uncombined with exogenous meteorological variables were adopted to fit the daily incidence of HFMD by using the data of the training set. The forecasting performances of the four fitted models were verified by using the data of the test set. Root mean square error (RMSE) was selected as the main measure to evaluate the performance of the models.

resultsThe RMSE for multivariate LSTM, univariate LSTM, ARIMA and ARIMAX (Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average Model with Exogenous Input Variables) was 10.78, 11.20, 12.43 and 14.73, respectively. The LSTM model with exogenous meteorological variables has the best performance among the four models and meteorological variables can increase the prediction accuracy of LSTM model. For the ARIMA model, exogenous meteorological variables did not increase the prediction accuracy but became the interference factor of the model.

conclusionsMultivariate LSTM is the best among the four models to fit the daily incidence of HFMD in Ningbo. It can provide a scientific method to build the HFMD early warning system and the methodology can also be applied to other communicable diseases.

Indexed as

Hand, Foot and Mouth DiseaseChinaForecastingHumansIncidenceMeteorological ConceptsModels, StatisticalNeural Networks, ComputerARIMAARIMAXHFMDmultivariate LSTMunivariate LSTM

Identifiers

PMID34200378
PMCPMC8201362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.