Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34200362›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2021

Effects of Sport-Based Interventions on Children's Executive Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Falonn Contreras-Osorio, Christian Campos-Jara, Cristian Martínez-Salazar, Luis Chirosa-Ríos, Darío Martínez-García

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Falonn Contreras-OsorioDepartment Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, 18011 Granada, Spain.
Christian Campos-JaraFaculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago de Chile 7591538, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-0298-837X
Cristian Martínez-SalazarDepartamento de Educación Física, Deportes y Recreación, Pedagogía en Educación Física, Facultad de Educación y Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4780000, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-9216-1826
Luis Chirosa-RíosDepartment Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, 18011 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1008-176X
Darío Martínez-GarcíaFaculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidad Andres Bello, Concepción 4030000, Chile.
Universidad Andrés Bello · CLUniversidad de Granada · ESUniversidad de La Frontera · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most studied aspects of children's cognitive development is that of the development of the executive function, and research has shown that physical activity has been demonstrated as a key factor in its enhancement. This meta-analysis aims to assess the impact of specific sports interventions on the executive function of children and teenagers. A systematic review was carried out on 1 November 2020 to search for published scientific evidence that analysed different sports programs that possibly affected executive function in students. Longitudinal studies, which assessed the effects of sports interventions on subjects between 6 and 18 years old, were identified through a systematic search of the four principal electronic databases: Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and EBSCO. A total of eight studies, with 424 subjects overall, met the inclusion criteria and were classified based on one or more of the following categories: working memory, inhibitory control, and cognitive flexibility. The random-effects model for meta-analyses was performed with RevMan version 5.3 to facilitate the analysis of the studies. Large effect sizes were found in all categories: working memory (ES -1.25; 95% CI -1.70; -0.79;

Indexed as

childrencognitive flexibilityexecutive functioninhibitory controlsportworking memory

Identifiers

PMID34200362
PMCPMC8226694
OpenAlexW3166908307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.