Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34200355›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

The Perceived Impact of The First UK COVID-19 Lockdown on Companion Animal Welfare and Behaviour: A Mixed-Method Study of Associations with Owner Mental Health.

Emily Shoesmith, Luciana Santos de Assis, Lion Shahab, Elena Ratschen, Paul Toner, Dimitra Kale, Catherine Reeve, Daniel S Mills

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Emily ShoesmithDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2420-4919
Luciana Santos de AssisSchool of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN6 7DL, UK.
Lion ShahabDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London WC1E 7HB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4033-442X
Elena RatschenDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4128-9608
Paul TonerSchool of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT9 5BN, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7801-7636
Dimitra KaleDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London WC1E 7HB, UK.
Catherine ReeveSchool of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT9 5BN, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9522-903X
Daniel S MillsSchool of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN6 7DL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4765-9625
Queen's University Belfast · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Lincoln · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCompanion animals may be a positive presence for their owners during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the welfare of a companion animal is strongly influenced by the behaviour of their owners, as well as their physical and social environment. We aimed to investigate the reported changes in companion animal welfare and behaviour and to examine the association between these changes and companion animal owners' mental health.

methodsA cross-sectional online survey of UK residents over 18 years of age was conducted between April and June 2020 (n = 5926). The questionnaire included validated, bespoke items measuring outcomes related to mental health, human-animal bonds and reported changes in animal welfare and behaviour. The final item of the survey invited open-ended free-text responses, allowing participants to describe experiences associated with human-animal relationships during the first UK lockdown phase.

resultsAnimal owners made up 89.8% of the sample (n = 5323), of whom 67.3% reported changes in their animal's welfare and behaviour during the first lockdown phase (n = 3583). These reported changes were reduced to a positive (0-7) and negative (0-5) welfare scale, following principal component analysis (PCA) of 17 items. Participants reported more positive changes for cats, whereas more negative changes were reported for dogs. Thematic analysis identified three main themes relating to the positive and negative impact on companion animals of the COVID-19 pandemic. Generalised linear models indicated that companion animal owners with poorer mental health scores pre-lockdown reported fewer negative changes in animal welfare and behaviour. However, companion animal owners with poorer mental health scores since lockdown reported more changes, both positive and negative, in animal welfare and behaviour.

conclusionOur findings extend previous insights into perceived welfare and behaviour changes on a very limited range of species to a wider range of companion animals. Owner mental health status has a clear, albeit small, effect on companion animal welfare and behaviour.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mental HealthAdolescentAdultAnimalsAnimal WelfareCatsCommunicable Disease ControlCross-Sectional StudiesDogsHumansPandemicsPetsSARS-CoV-2United Kingdomanimal behaviouranimal welfarecompanion animalsCOVID-19human-animal interactionhuman-animal relationshipslonelinessmental health

Identifiers

PMID34200355
PMCPMC8201214
OpenAlexW3170048124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.