Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34200317›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and Clinical Outcomes in the Older People at the Emergency Department.

Cheng-Fu Lin, Po-Chen Lin, Sung-Yuan Hu, Yu-Tse Tsan, Wei-Kai Liao, Shih-Yi Lin, Tzu-Chieh Lin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Team-based, Multidisciplinary Care in the Emergency Department.Emergency medicine clinics of North America · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cheng-Fu LinDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-3341-7315
Po-Chen LinDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan.
Sung-Yuan HuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan.
Yu-Tse TsanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-9148-8811
Wei-Kai LiaoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan.
Shih-Yi LinDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-1901-2656
Tzu-Chieh LinDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-6542-2023
Taichung Veterans General Hospital · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visits by older people to the Emergency Department (ED) have increased in recent decades with higher revisiting and admission rates after discharge, particularly for those with frailties. This study used a before-after design aimed at evaluating Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) screening in older ED patients (aged ≥ 75 years) during the 12-month preintervention period. Additionally, a CGA-based structured follow-up program after ED discharge was executed during the next 12-month intervention period. Amongst the 358 participants (median age 82 years), involving 122 in the preintervention period and 236 in the intervention period, 77 participants (21.5%) were identified as pre-frailty, while 274 (76.5%) were identified as frail using the Fried frailty phenotype. One-hundred ten (110) (30.7%) patients revisited the ED with 73 (20.4%) being admitted and 20 (5.6%) dying within three months after ED discharge. Compared with preintervention and intervention period, it was shown that the rates of admission at the index ED visit (50.8% vs. 23.1%), and mortality (10.7% vs. 3.0%), were both were significantly reduced. Using multivariate regression analysis, it was shown frailty was significantly associated with three-month mortality after adjusting for potential confounders. On the contrary, the program significantly decreased admission and death rate. It is suggested that frailty was prevalent amongst the older ED patients, and should be screened for in order to decrease revisits/admissions after ED discharge.

Indexed as

FrailtyGeriatric AssessmentAgedAged, 80 and overEmergency Service, HospitalHospitalizationHumansacute careemergency departmentfrailtygeriatric assessmentolder people

Identifiers

PMID34200317
PMCPMC8201329
OpenAlexW3168013694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.