Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34200191›Full record

ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2021

Bioactivity of an Experimental Dental Implant with Anodized Surface.

Maria Fernanda Lima Villaça-Carvalho, Juliani Caroline Ribeiro de Araújo, Juliana Mariano Beraldo, Renata Falchete do Prado, Mari Eli Leonelli de Moraes, Luiz Roberto Coutinho Manhães Junior, Eduardo Norberto Codaro, Heloisa Andrea Acciari, João Paulo Barros Machado, Natal Nerímio Regone and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Maria Fernanda Lima Villaça-CarvalhoDepartment of Bioscience and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology, UNESP-São Paulo State University São José dos Campos, São Paulo 12245-000, Brazil.
Juliani Caroline Ribeiro de AraújoDepartment of Bioscience and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology, UNESP-São Paulo State University São José dos Campos, São Paulo 12245-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6926-1581
Juliana Mariano BeraldoDepartment of Bioscience and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology, UNESP-São Paulo State University São José dos Campos, São Paulo 12245-000, Brazil.
Renata Falchete do PradoDepartment of Bioscience and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology, UNESP-São Paulo State University São José dos Campos, São Paulo 12245-000, Brazil.
Mari Eli Leonelli de MoraesDepartment of Bioscience and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology, UNESP-São Paulo State University São José dos Campos, São Paulo 12245-000, Brazil.
Luiz Roberto Coutinho Manhães JuniorDepartment of Bioscience and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology, UNESP-São Paulo State University São José dos Campos, São Paulo 12245-000, Brazil.
Eduardo Norberto CodaroDepartment of Chemistry and Energy, School of Engineering, Guaratinguetá Campus, UNESP-São Paulo State University, Guaratinguetá, São Paulo 12516-410, Brazil.
Heloisa Andrea AcciariDepartment of Chemistry and Energy, School of Engineering, Guaratinguetá Campus, UNESP-São Paulo State University, Guaratinguetá, São Paulo 12516-410, Brazil.
João Paulo Barros MachadoAssociated Laboratory of Sensors and Materials, National Institute for Space Research, INPE, São José dos Campos, São Paulo 12227-010, Brazil.
Natal Nerímio RegoneDepartment of Aeronautic and Communication Engineering São João da Boa Vista Campus, UNESP-São Paulo State University, São João da Boa Vista, São Paulo 13876-750, Brazil.
Anderson Oliveira LoboLIMAV-Interdisciplinary Laboratory for Advanced Materials, BioMatLab, UFPI-Federal University of Piaui, Teresina 64049-550, Brazil.
Fernanda Roberta MarcianoDepartment of Physics, UFPI-Federal University of Piauí, Teresina 64049-550, Brazil.
Luana Marotta Reis de VasconcellosDepartment of Bioscience and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology, UNESP-São Paulo State University São José dos Campos, São Paulo 12245-000, Brazil.

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 11/17392-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral studies proved that anodic oxidation improves osseointegration. This study aimed to optimize osseointegration through anodization in dental implants, obtaining anatase phase and controlled nanotopography.

methodsThe division of the groups with 60 titanium implants was: control (CG); sandblasted (SG); anodized (AG): anodized pulsed current (duty cycle 30%, 30 V, 0.2 A and 1000 Hz). Before surgery, surface characterization was performed using Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), X-ray Dispersive Energy Spectroscopy (EDS) and Raman Spectroscopy. For in vivo tests, 10 New Zealand white rabbits received an implant from each group. The sacrifice period was 2 and 6 weeks (

resultsAFM and SEM demonstrated a particular nanotopography on the surface in AG; the anatase phase was proved by Raman spectroscopy. In the μCT and in the reverse torque test, the AG group presented better results than the other groups.

conclusionThe chemical composition and structure of the TiO

Indexed as

anodizingmicrotomographynanotechnologyosseointegration

Identifiers

PMID34200191
PMCPMC8293239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.