Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34200160›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Oat-Based Foods: Chemical Constituents, Glycemic Index, and the Effect of Processing.

Kailong Zhang, Rui Dong, Xinzhong Hu, Changzhong Ren, Yuwei Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kailong ZhangDepartment of Food Engineering and Nutrition Science, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710119, China.
Rui DongDepartment of Food Engineering and Nutrition Science, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710119, China.
Xinzhong HuDepartment of Food Engineering and Nutrition Science, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710119, China.
Changzhong RenBaicheng Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Baicheng 137000, China.
Yuwei LiGuilin Seamild Food Co., Ltd., Guilin 541000, China.

Funding

Cereal Food Science and Nutrition Innovation Team 2020TD-049China Agriculture Research System CARS-07-EShaanxi International Science and Technology Cooperation Bases 2018SD0015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The desire for foods with lower glycemic indices has led to the exploration of functional ingredients and novel food processing techniques. The glycemic index (GI) is a well-recognized tool to assess the capacity of foods to raise blood glucose levels. Among cereal crops, oats have shown the greatest promise for mitigating glycemic response. This review evaluated decades of research on the effects of oat components on the GI level of oat-based foods with specific emphasis on oat starch, β-glucans, proteins, and phenolics. The effects of commonly used processing techniques in oats on GI level, including heating, cooling, and germination were also discussed. In addition, the GI of oat-based foods in various physical formats such as whole grain, flakes, and flour was systematically summarized. The aim of this review was to synthesize knowledge of the field and to provide a deeper understanding of how the chemical composition and processing of oats affect GI, thereby further benefiting the development of low-GI oat foods.

Indexed as

functional foodglycemic indexoatsprocessingβ-glucans

Identifiers

PMID34200160
PMCPMC8229445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.