Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34200143›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

A Novel Guided Zygomatic and Pterygoid Implant Surgery System: A Human Cadaver Study on Accuracy.

Francesco Grecchi, Luigi V Stefanelli, Fabrizio Grivetto, Emma Grecchi, Rami Siev, Ziv Mazor, Massimo Del Fabbro, Nicola Pranno, Alessio Franchina, Vittorio Di Lucia and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Francesco GrecchiIRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico) Orthopedic Institute Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi, 4, 20161 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3770-1375
Luigi V StefanelliPrivate Practice, Viale Leonardo Da Vinci 256, 00145 Rome, Italy.
Fabrizio GrivettoMaggiore della Carità di Novara, Università degli studi del Piemonte Orientale "Amedeo Avogadro", Reparto di Chirurgia Maxillo-Facciale, C.so Mazzini 18, 28100 Novara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7303-7264
Emma GrecchiPrivate Practice, Via G. Boccaccio 34, 20123 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3417-5488
Rami SievPrivate Practice, Tel Aviv Basel St 46, Tel Aviv 6100000, Israel.
Ziv MazorPrivate Practice, Tel Aviv Basel St 46, Tel Aviv 6100000, Israel.
Massimo Del FabbroIRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico) Orthopedic Institute Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi, 4, 20161 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7144-0984
Nicola PrannoDepartment of Oral and Maxillo Facial Science, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Caserta 6, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4095-0900
Alessio FranchinaPrivate Practice, Via Legione Gallieno 44, 36100 Vicenza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7679-6776
Vittorio Di LuciaPrivate Practice, Viale Leonardo Da Vinci 256, 00145 Rome, Italy.
Francesca De AngelisDepartment of Oral and Maxillo Facial Science, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Caserta 6, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Funda GokerDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2354-361X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this human cadaver study was to assess the accuracy of zygomatic/pterygoid implant placement using custom-made bone-supported laser sintered titanium templates. For this purpose, pre-surgical planning was done on computed tomography scans of each cadaver. Surgical guides were printed using direct metal laser sintering technology. Four zygomatic and two pterygoid implants were inserted in each case using the guided protocol and related tools. Post-operative computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained to evaluate deviations between the planned and inserted implants. Accuracy was measured by overlaying the real position in the post-operative CT on the virtual presurgical placement of the implant in a CT image. Descriptive and bivariate analyses of the data were performed. As a result, a total of 40 zygomatic and 20 pterygoid implants were inserted in 10 cadavers. The mean deviations between the planned and the placed zygomatic and pterygoid implants were respectively (mean ± SD): 1.69° ± 1.12° and 4.15° ± 3.53° for angular deviation. Linear distance deviations: 0.93 mm ± 1.23 mm and 1.35 mm ± 1.45 mm at platform depth, 1.35 mm ± 0.78 mm and 1.81 mm ± 1.47 mm at apical plane, 1.07 mm ± 1.47 mm and 1.22 mm ± 1.44 mm for apical depth. In conclusion, the surgical guide system showed accuracy for all the variables studied and allowed acceptable and accurate implant placement regardless of the case complexity.

Indexed as

Surgery, Computer-AssistedCadaverComputer-Aided DesignHumansProstheses and ImplantsTomography, X-Ray ComputedaccuracyCAD/CAMcomputer aided implantologydynamic navigationguidanceguided surgerynavigationpterygoid implantssurgical guidessurgical templateszygomatic implant

Identifiers

PMID34200143
PMCPMC8201303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.