Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34199971›Full record

ArticleVaccines2021

Evaluation of Immunity for Mumps among Vaccinated Medical Students.

Cristiana Ferrari, Marco Trabucco Aurilio, Andrea Mazza, Antonio Pietroiusti, Andrea Magrini, Ottavia Balbi, Matteo Bolcato, Luca Coppeta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cristiana FerrariDepartment of Occupational Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2292-3338
Marco Trabucco AurilioDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences "Vincenzo Tiberio", University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2327-1455
Andrea MazzaDepartment of Occupational Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133 Roma, Italy.
Antonio PietroiustiDepartment of Occupational Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133 Roma, Italy.
Andrea MagriniDepartment of Occupational Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133 Roma, Italy.
Ottavia BalbiDepartment of Occupational Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133 Roma, Italy.
Matteo BolcatoLegal Medicine, University of Padua, Via Falloppio 50, 35121 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8784-8463
Luca CoppetaDepartment of Occupational Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2470-6107
University of Rome Tor Vergata · ITUniversity of Molise · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare workers are considered at higher risk for mumps infection than the general population. Since 2017, the national immunization plan recommended the administration of a dose of measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine to the healthcare operators who are unable to demonstrate a complete vaccination history or that are seronegative for at least one of the three agents. Regarding mumps infection, based on actual concerns regarding the loss of protection over the years after vaccination, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended to administer a third dose of vaccine to operators previously vaccinated with two doses of MMR vaccine who belong to a group at increased risk of mumps infection in the event of an epidemic. This guideline, however, is not currently followed in Italy, resulting in a potential risk for vaccinated operators to become unprotected from mumps over the years. The aim of our study is to evaluate the persistence of a protective antibody level for mumps among medical students vaccinated during infancy or adolescence, at the start of their hospital internship. We retrospectively evaluated mumps-specific IgG levels in a group of medical students, in the period from 1 January to 31 December 2020. We evaluated the persistence of the detectable level of mumps-specific antibodies in relation to their vaccinal status, gender and time elapsed from vaccination. We found that 17.4% (65 subjects) of our sample were seronegative for mumps. The univariate analysis showed a significant difference in serological protection between male and female gender (77.0% vs. 86.2%;

Indexed as

health care workersmumpsoutbreakstudentsvaccination

Identifiers

PMID34199971
PMCPMC8226533
OpenAlexW3166397461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.