Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34199660›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

A Grain-Based SARA Challenge Affects the Composition of Epimural and Mucosa-Associated Bacterial Communities throughout the Digestive Tract of Dairy Cows.

Jan C Plaizier, Anne-Mette Danscher, Paula A Azevedo, Hooman Derakhshani, Pia H Andersen, Ehsan Khafipour

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Yak Gut Microbiota: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Jan C PlaizierDepartment of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada.
Anne-Mette DanscherDepartment of Large Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2630 Taastrup, Denmark.
Paula A AzevedoDepartment of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada.
Hooman DerakhshaniDepartment of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada.
Pia H AndersenDepartment of Anatomy, Physiology and Biochemistry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 750-07 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6039-7439
Ehsan KhafipourDepartment of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4673-7633
University of Manitoba · CASwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Manitoba Agricultural Development and Research Council 11.1096Teknologi og Produktion, Det Frie Forskningsråd 0602-01736b
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effects of a subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA) challenge on the composition of epimural and mucosa-associated bacterial communities throughout the digestive tract were determined in eight non-lactating Holstein cows. Treatments included feeding a control diet containing 19.6% dry matter (DM) starch and a SARA-challenge diet containing 33.3% DM starch for two days after a 4-day grain step-up. Subsequently, epithelial samples from the rumen and mucosa samples from the duodenum, proximal, middle and distal jejunum, ileum, cecum and colon were collected. Extracted DNA from these samples were analyzed using MiSeq Illumina sequencing of the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. Distinct clustering patterns for each diet existed for all sites. The SARA challenge decreased microbial diversity at all sites, with the exception of the middle jejunum. The SARA challenge also affected the relative abundances of several major phyla and genera at all sites but the magnitude of these effects differed among sites. In the rumen and colon, the largest effects were an increase in the relative abundance of Firmicutes and a reduction of Bacteroidetes. In the small intestine, the largest effect was an increase in the relative abundance of Actinobacteria. The grain-based SARA challenge conducted in this study did not only affect the composition and cause dysbiosis of epimural microbiota in the rumen, it also affected the mucosa-associated microbiota in the intestines. To assess the extent of this dysbiosis, its effects on the functionality of these microbiota must be determined in future.

Indexed as

dairy cowsdigestive tractmicrobiotaMiSeq Illumina sequencingSARA

Identifiers

PMID34199660
PMCPMC8227306
OpenAlexW3167116601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.