Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34199495›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Healthcare Professionals' Role in Social Media Public Health Campaigns: Analysis of Spanish Pro Vaccination Campaign on Twitter.

Ivan Herrera-Peco, Beatriz Jiménez-Gómez, Juan José Peña Deudero, Elvira Benitez De Gracia, Carlos Ruiz-Núñez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ivan Herrera-PecoNursing Department, Faculty of Medicine, Alfonso X El Sabio University, Villanueva de la Cañada, 28691 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5183-5679
Beatriz Jiménez-GómezNursing Department, Faculty of Medicine, Alfonso X El Sabio University, Villanueva de la Cañada, 28691 Madrid, Spain.
Juan José Peña DeuderoFaculty of Health Sciences, Alfonso X el Sabio University, Villanueva de la Cañada, 28691 Madrid, Spain.
Elvira Benitez De GraciaFaculty of Health Sciences, Alfonso X el Sabio University, Villanueva de la Cañada, 28691 Madrid, Spain.
Carlos Ruiz-NúñezHigh Resolution Hospital, APES Poniente, Av. Tierno Galván, Loja, 18300 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2872-1494
Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio · ESHospital de Poniente · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has generated a great impact worldwide both on the population health but also on an economic and social level. In this health emergency, a key element has been and still is the need for information, which has become a daily concern for many people. Social media represent powerful tools for searching and gathering health-related information, thus becoming a new place where health authorities need to be present to disseminate information of preventive measures like vaccines against COVID-19, as well as try to block information against these public health measures. The main goal of this study was to analyze the role that healthcare professionals have in Twitter to support the campaign of public institutions on vaccination against COVID-19. To address this study, an analysis of the messages sent on Twitter containing the hashtag #yomevacuno, between 12 December 2020 was developed using the NodeXL software (Social Media Research Foundation, Redwood, CA, USA), focusing on content analysis of tweets and users' accounts to identify healthcare professionals. The results show that healthcare professionals represent only 11.38% of users, being responsible for 6.35% of impressions generated by the network #yomevacuno. We can observe that traffic information generated by healthcare professionals is not significant in comparison with institutions (

Indexed as

COVID-19healthcare professionalspublic healthsocial mediavaccines

Identifiers

PMID34199495
PMCPMC8227422
OpenAlexW3170493121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.