Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34199374›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Hyaluronan Hydrogels for Injection in Superficial Dermal Layers: An In Vitro Characterization to Compare Performance and Unravel the Scientific Basis of Their Indication.

Annalisa La Gatta, Maria Aschettino, Antonietta Stellavato, Antonella D'Agostino, Valentina Vassallo, Emiliano Bedini, Gilberto Bellia, Chiara Schiraldi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Annalisa La GattaDepartment of Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Via L. De Crecchio 7, 80138 Naples, Italy.
Maria AschettinoDepartment of Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Via L. De Crecchio 7, 80138 Naples, Italy.
Antonietta StellavatoDepartment of Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Via L. De Crecchio 7, 80138 Naples, Italy.
Antonella D'AgostinoDepartment of Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Via L. De Crecchio 7, 80138 Naples, Italy.
Valentina VassalloDepartment of Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Via L. De Crecchio 7, 80138 Naples, Italy.
Emiliano BediniDepartment of Chemical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Complesso Universitario Monte S. Angelo, Via Cintia 4, 80126 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4923-3756
Gilberto BelliaIBSA Farmaceutici Italia, 26900 Lodi, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5912-0961
Chiara SchiraldiDepartment of Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Via L. De Crecchio 7, 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1066-843X

Funding

Invitalia project, Altergon-"Contratto di Sviluppo" CDS 000463
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSkinboosters represent the latest category of hyaluronan (HA) hydrogels released for aesthetic purposes. Different from originally developed gels, they are intended for more superficial injections, claiming a skin rejuvenation effect through hydration and possibly prompting biochemical effects in place of the conventional volumetric action. Here, three commercial skinboosters were characterized to unravel the scientific basis for such indication and to compare their performances.

methodsGels were evaluated for water-soluble/insoluble-HA composition, rheology, hydration, cohesivity, stability and effect, in vitro, on human dermal fibroblasts towards the production of extracellular matrix components.

resultsMarked differences in the insoluble-hydrogel amount and in the hydrodynamic parameters for water-soluble-HA chains were evidenced among the gels. Hydration, rigidity and cohesivity also varied over a wide range. Sensitivity to hyaluronidases and Reactive Oxygen Species was demonstrated allowing a stability ranking. Slight differences were found in gels' ability to prompt elastin expression and in ColIV/ColI ratio.

conclusionsA wide panel of biophysical and biochemical parameters for skinboosters was provided, supporting clinicians in the conscious tuning of their use. Data revealed great variability in gels' behavior notwithstanding the same clinical indication and unexpected similarities to the volumetric formulations. Data may be useful to improve customization of gel design toward specific uses.

Indexed as

ElastinFibroblastsHumansHyaluronic AcidHyaluronoglucosaminidaseHydrogelsInjectionsReactive Oxygen SpeciesRejuvenationRheologySkinSkin AgingViscosityElastinHyaluronic AcidHyaluronoglucosaminidaseHydrogelsReactive Oxygen Speciesdegradation by reactive oxygen speciesdermal fillerglycosaminoglycanshuman dermal fibroblastshyaluronanhyaluronidasehydrationrheological behavior

Identifiers

PMID34199374
PMCPMC8199639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.