ArticleMicroorganisms2021
Discrimination of
Article in Microorganisms, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Performance of the LIAISON PLEX gram-positive blood culture assay for identifying bacterial pathogens and resistance genes in blood cultures.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2026Article
- Commensal and opportunistic bacteria resistant to fourth-generation cephalosporins or fluoroquinolones isolated from yellow-legged gulls (Larus michahellis) settled in Taranto, Southern Italy.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- TrackingACS omega · 2026Review
- Metabolites derived from bacterial isolates of the human skin microbiome inhibitMicrobiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Genomic epidemiology of aMicrobial genomics · 2025Article
- Identification ofItalian journal of food safety · 2025Article
- Isolation ofmicroPublication biology · 2025Article
- Enhanced vitamin BBMC biotechnology · 2024Article
- Antimicrobial and Phylogenomic Characterization ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Bacterial Pesticides: Mechanism of Action, Possibility of Food Contamination, and Residue Analysis Using MS.Journal of pesticide science · 2024Article
- MALDI-TOF as a powerful tool for identifying and differentiating closely related microorganisms: the strange case of three reference strains of Paenibacillus polymyxa.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Application of Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy to Discriminate Two Closely Related Bacterial Species:Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Get to Know Your Neighbors: Characterization of CloseMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Comparison of automatic methods MALDI-TOF, VITEK2 and manual methods for the identification of intestinal microbial communities on the example of samples from alpacas (Journal of veterinary research · 2023Article
- Accurate noise-robust classification of Bacillus species from MALDI-TOF MS spectra using a denoising autoencoder.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Differentiation betweenInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Microbiota and Cyanotoxin Content of Retail Spirulina Supplements and Spirulina Supplemented Foods.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Prevalence and Antibiotic Resistance ofMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Isolation and Identification of Bacteria of GenusMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Serotype-identifying ions inHeliyon · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time Of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) technology is currently increasingly used in diagnostic laboratories as a cost effective, rapid and reliable routine technique for the identification and typing of microorganisms. In this study, we used MALDI-TOF MS to analyze a collection of 160 strains belonging to the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.