Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34199218›Full record

ArticleToxins2021

A Novel and Efficient High-Yield Method for Preparing Bacterial Ghosts.

Yi Ma, Liu Cui, Meng Wang, Qiuli Sun, Kaisheng Liu, Jufang Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxins, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Bacterial ghosts (BGs): A promising approach as candidate vaccine.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Efficient Robust Yield Method for Preparing Bacterial Ghosts byBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  9. Protective Immunity againstInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yi MaSchool of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Liu CuiSchool of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Meng WangSchool of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9381-5422
Qiuli SunSchool of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Kaisheng LiuShenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen 518020, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4755-0523
Jufang WangSchool of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9908-1001
South China University of Technology · CNJinan University · CN

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2018MS54Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2019A1515011251the Science and Technology Foundation of Shenzhen JCYJ20200109144410181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial ghosts (BGs) are empty cell envelopes possessing native extracellular structures without a cytoplasm and genetic materials. BGs are proposed to have significant prospects in biomedical research as vaccines or delivery carriers. The applications of BGs are often limited by inefficient bacterial lysis and a low yield. To solve these problems, we compared the lysis efficiency of the wild-type protein E (E

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsCell MembraneEscherichia coliMutationPlasmidsViral ProteinsBacterial ProteinsE protein, bacteriophage X174Viral Proteinsbacterial ghostslysis efficiencypLysSΦX174

Identifiers

PMID34199218
PMCPMC8231862
OpenAlexW3166692572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.